Dear Brethren,
The most powerful Muslim state in vicinity of Israel was Iraq. Iraq was attacked by Israel in 1979 when eight F-16As, and six F-15As destroyed nuclear facilities of Iraq which as per Iraq and France were meant solely for peaceful use. Israel could not tolerate a strong adversary having even a possibility of nuclear weapons. Israel itself has nuclear weapons. Except for empty and a bland resolution condemning Israel for its action UN did nothing.
The most powerful Muslim state in vicinity of Israel was Iraq. Iraq was attacked by Israel in 1979 when eight F-16As, and six F-15As destroyed nuclear facilities of Iraq which as per Iraq and France were meant solely for peaceful use. Israel could not tolerate a strong adversary having even a possibility of nuclear weapons. Israel itself has nuclear weapons. Except for empty and a bland resolution condemning Israel for its action UN did nothing.
One need not get his hands dirty when one has
other to do its job. Iraq abandoned nuclear project. The Osirak facility
remained in its damaged state until the 1991, when it was completely destroyed
by air strikes by the United States Air Force.
And Iraq finally decimated in 2003.
In 2011 three countries simultaneously faced “revolutions”.
All three countries are immediate neighbors of Israel. All three neighbors were
inimical to Israel and all the three countries faced internal revolt. Was it
mere coincidence ? Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time
it’s enemy action. And as for the revolutions, they can be easily faked.
Egypt;
January 25, 2011 – Anti Mubarak Protests begin.
February 11, 2011 – Mubarak
Deposed.
Egypt decimated.
Libya;
February 15, 2011 - Anti
Gaddafi protests begin with pro-active intervention of US, UK, France, Italy,
Norway, Spain, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Qatar and seven other states.
October 20, 2011 - Col Gaddafi Killed.
Libya decimated.
Syria
March 15, 2011 - Anti
Assad protests begin
Assad just managing to hang on.
Syria on verge of being decimated.
When we look at the recent happenings in
Iraq, Libya, Egypt and Syria and look at the Map of promised land one cannot but
think that the uprisings in all the above nations were faked to realize the
dream and security of Israel
The plan operates on two essential premises.
To survive, Israel must
1) Become an imperial regional power, and
2) Must effect the division of the whole area
into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states. Small here
will depend on the ethnic or sectarian composition of each state. Consequently,
the Zionist hope is that sectarian-based states become Israel's satellites and,
ironically, its source of moral legitimization. A sun having its own satellites.
It is also clear that the Palestinians were
never the sole target of Zionist plans, but the priority target since their
viable and independent presence as a people negates the essence of the Zionist
state. Every Arab state, however, especially those with cohesive and clear
nationalist directions, is a real target sooner or later. For Palestinians the plan
appears to be to give them Jordan.
What Israel wants and what they are planning
for is a world of Arab fragments that is ready to succumb to Israeli hegemony.
Hence, Oded Yinon in his essay, "A Strategy for Israel in the
1980's," talks about "far-reaching opportunities for the first time
since 1967" that are created by the "very stormy situation [that]
surrounds Israel."
The following essay represents, an accurate
and detailed plan of the Zionist regime for the Middle East which is based on
the division of the whole area into small states, and the dissolution of all
the existing Arab states. The idea that all the Arab states should be broken
down, by Israel, into small units, occurs again and again in Israeli strategic
thinking. For example, Ze'ev Schiff, the military correspondent of Ha'aretz
(and probably the most knowledgeable in Israel, on this topic) writes about the
"best" that can happen for Israeli interests in Iraq: "The
dissolution of Iraq into a Shi'ite state, a Sunni state and the separation of
the Kurdish part" (Ha'aretz 6/2/1982).
The Zionist Plan for the Middle East
The Israel of Theodore Herzl (1904) and
of
Rabbi Fischmann (1947)
In his Complete Diaries, Vol. II. p. 711,
Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism, says that the area of the Jewish State
stretches: "From the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates."
Rabbi
Fischmann, member of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, declared in his testimony
to the U.N. Special Committee of Enquiry on 9 July 1947: "The Promised
Land extends from the River of Egypt up to the Euphrates, it includes parts of
Syria and Lebanon."
from Oded Yinon's
"A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen
Eighties"
Published by the Association of Arab-American
University Graduates, Inc. Belmont, Massachusetts, 1982 Special Document No. 1
(ISBN 0-937694-56-8)
This essay originally appeared in Hebrew in
KIVUNIM (Directions), A Journal for Judaism and Zionism; Issue No, 14--Winter,
5742, February 1982, Editor: Yoram Beck. Editorial Committee: Eli Eyal, Yoram
Beck, Amnon Hadari, Yohanan Manor, Elieser Schweid. Published by the Department
of Publicity/The World Zionist Organization, Jerusalem. Below I give relevant excerpts
only.
“The view that ethics plays no part in
determining the direction Man takes, but rather his material needs do--that
view is becoming prevalent today as we see a world in which nearly all values
are disappearing. We are losing the ability to assess the simplest things,
especially when they concern the simple question of what is Good and what is
Evil.”
“The war over resources in the world, the Arab
monopoly on oil, and the need of the West to import most of its raw materials
from the Third World, are transforming the world we know, given that one of the
major aims of the USSR is to defeat the West by gaining control over the
gigantic resources in the Persian Gulf and in the southern part of Africa, in
which the majority of world minerals are located. We can imagine the dimensions
of the global confrontation which will face us in the future.”
“The Moslem Arab World is built like a
temporary house of cards put together by foreigners (France and Britain in the
Nineteen Twenties), without the wishes and desires of the inhabitants having
been taken into account. It was arbitrarily divided into 19 states, all made of
combinations of minorities and ethnic groups which are hostile to one another,
so that every Arab Moslem state nowadays faces ethnic social destruction from
within, and in some a civil war is already raging”.
“In the course of the Nineteen Eighties, the
State of Israel will have to go through far-reaching changes in its political
and economic regime domestically, along with radical changes in its foreign
policy, in order to stand up to the global and regional challenges of this new
epoch. The loss of the Suez Canal oil fields, of the immense potential of the
oil, gas and other natural resources in the Sinai peninsula which is geomorphologically
identical to the rich oil-producing countries in the region, will result in an
energy drain in the near future and will destroy our domestic economy: one
quarter of our present GNP as well as one third of the budget is used for the
purchase of oil.9 The search for raw materials in the Negev and on the coast
will not, in the near future, serve to alter that state of affairs.”
“(Regaining) the Sinai peninsula with its
present and potential resources is therefore a political priority which is
obstructed by the Camp David and the peace agreements. The fault for that lies
of course with the present Israeli government and the governments which paved
the road to the policy of territorial compromise, the Alignment governments
since 1967. The Egyptians will not need to keep the peace treaty after the
return of the Sinai, and they will do all they can to return to the fold of the
Arab world and to the USSR in order to gain support and military assistance.
American aid is guaranteed only for a short while, for the terms of the peace
and the weakening of the U.S. both at home and abroad will bring about a
reduction in aid. Without oil and the income from it, with the present enormous
expenditure, we will not be able to get through 1982 under the present
conditions and we will have to act in order to return the situation to the
status quo which existed in Sinai prior to Sadat's visit and the mistaken peace
agreement signed with him in March 1979.”
“The economic situation in Egypt, the nature
of the regime and its pan-Arab policy, will bring about a situation
after April 1982 in which Israel will be forced to act directly or indirectly
in order to regain control over Sinai as a strategic, economic and energy
reserve for the long run. Egypt does not constitute a military strategic
problem due to its internal conflicts and it could be driven back to the post
1967 war situation in no more than one day
Breaking Egypt down territorially into
distinct geographical regions is the political aim of Israel in the Nineteen
Eighties on its Western front.”
“Egypt is divided and torn apart into many
foci of authority. If Egypt falls apart, countries like Libya, Sudan or even
the more distant states will not continue to exist in their present form and
will join the downfall and dissolution of Egypt. The vision of a Christian
Coptic State in Upper Egypt alongside a number of weak states with very
localized power and without a centralized government as to date, is the key to
a historical development which was only set back by the peace agreement but
which seems inevitable in the long run.”
“The dissolution of Syria and Iraq later on
into ethnically or religiously unqiue areas such as in Lebanon, is Israel's
primary target on the Eastern front in the long run, while the dissolution of
the military power of those states serves as the primary short term target.
Syria will fall apart, in accordance with its ethnic and religious structure,
into several states such as in present day Lebanon, so that there will be a
Shi'ite Alawi state along its coast, a Sunni state in the Aleppo area, another
Sunni state in Damascus hostile to its northern neighbor, and the Druzes who
will set up a state, maybe even in our Golan, and certainly in the Hauran and
in northern Jordan. This state of affairs will be the guarantee for peace and
security in the area in the long run, and that aim is already within our reach
today”
“Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally
torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel's targets. Its
dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger
than Syria.”
“There is no chance that Jordan will continue
to exist in its present structure for a long time, and Israel's policy, both in
war and in peace, ought to be directed at the liquidation of Jordan under the
present regime and the transfer of power to the Palestinian majority. Changing
the regime east of the river will also cause the termination of the problem of
the territories densely populated with Arabs west of the Jordan. Whether in war
or under conditions of peace, emigration from the territories and economic
demographic freeze in them, are the guarantees for the coming change on both
banks of the river, and we ought to be active in order to accelerate this
process in the nearest future. The autonomy plan ought also to be rejected, as
well as any compromise or division of the territories for, given the plans of
the PLO and those of the Israeli Arabs themselves, the Shefa'amr plan of
September 1980, it is not possible to go on living in this country in the
present situation without separating the two nations, the Arabs to Jordan and
the Jews to the areas west of the river. Genuine coexistence and peace will
reign over the land only when the Arabs understand that without Jewish rule
between the Jordan and the sea they will have neither existence nor security. A
nation of their own and security will be theirs only in Jordan.”
“Within Israel Rebalancing the country
demographically, strategically and economically is the highest and most central
aim today. Taking hold of the mountain watershed from Beersheba to the Upper
Galilee is the national aim generated by the major strategic consideration
which is settling the mountainous part of the country that is empty of Jews
today.”
Oded Yinon's
Source;
No comments:
Post a Comment