Lies
being taught;
Mein
Kampf is unintelligible ravings of a maniac.
Now
the Truth; WHY THE SECOND REICH COLLAPSED
CHAPTER
Xb – The loss of war was internal not external.
“Let
us examine the symptoms that were evident in Germany at the time that the
German people accepted this defeat. Is it not true that in several circles the
misfortunes of the Fatherland were even joyfully welcomed in the most shameful
manner? Who could act in such a way without thereby meriting vengeance for his
attitude? Were there not people who even went further and boasted that they had
gone to the extent of weakening the front and causing a collapse? Therefore it
was not the enemy who brought this disgrace upon our shoulders but rather our
own countrymen. If they suffered misfortune for it afterwards, was that
misfortune undeserved? Was there ever a case in history where a people declared
itself guilty of a war, and that even against its better conscience and its
better knowledge?
No, and again no. In the manner in which
the German nation reacted to its defeat we can see that the real cause of our
collapse must be looked for elsewhere and not in the purely military loss of a
few positions or the failure of an offensive. For if the front as such had
given way and thus brought about a national disaster, then the German nation
would have accepted the defeat in quite another spirit. They would have borne
the subsequent misfortune with clenched teeth, or they would have been
overwhelmed by sorrow. Regret and fury would have filled their hearts against
an enemy into whose hands victory had been given by a chance event or the
decree of Fate; and in that case the nation, following the example of the Roman
Senate (Note 14), would have faced the defeated legions on their return and
expressed their thanks for the sacrifices that had been made and would have
requested them not to lose faith in the Empire. Even the capitulation would
have been signed under the sway of calm reason, while the heart would have
beaten in the hope of the coming REVANCHE.
[Note 14. Probably the author has two
separate incidents in mind. The first happened in 390 B.C., when, as the
victorious Gauls descended on Rome, the Senators ordered their ivory chairs to
be placed in the Forum before the Temples of the Gods. There, clad in their
robes of state, they awaited the invader, hoping to save the city by
sacrificing themselves. This noble gesture failed for the time being; but it
had an inspiring influence on subsequent generations. The second incident,
which has more historical authenticity, occurred after the Roman defeat at
Cannae in 216 B.C. On that occasion Varro, the Roman commander, who, though in
great part responsible for the disaster, made an effort to carry on the
struggle, was, on his return to Rome, met by the citizens of all ranks and
publicly thanked because he had not despaired of the Republic. The consequence
was that the Republic refused to make peace with the victorious Carthagenians.]
That is the reception that would have been
given to a military defeat which had to be attributed only to the adverse
decree of Fortune. There would have been neither joy-making nor dancing.
Cowardice would not have been boasted of, and the defeat would not have been
honoured. On returning from the Front, the troops would not have been mocked
at, and the colours would not have been dragged in the dust. But above all,
that disgraceful state of affairs could never have arisen which induced a
British officer, Colonel Repington, to declare with scorn: Every third German
is a traitor! No, in such a case this plague would never have assumed the
proportions of a veritable flood which, for the past five years, has smothered
every vestige of respect for the German nation in the outside world.
This shows only too clearly how false it is
to say that the loss of the War was the cause of the German break-up. No. The
military defeat was itself but the consequence of a whole series of morbid
symptoms and their causes which had become active in the German nation before
the War broke out. The War was the first catastrophal consequence, visible to
all, of how traditions and national morale had been poisoned and how the
instinct of self-preservation had degenerated. These were the preliminary
causes which for many years had been undermining the foundations of the nation
and the Empire.
But it remained for the Jews, with their
unqualified capacity for falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists,
to impute responsibility for the downfall precisely to the man who alone had
shown a superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the catastrophe
which he had foreseen and to save the nation from that hour of complete
overthrow and shame. By placing responsibility for the loss of the world war on
the shoulders of Ludendorff they took away the weapon of moral right from the
only adversary dangerous enough to be likely to succeed in bringing the
betrayers of the Fatherland to Justice. All this was inspired by the
principle--which is quite true in itself--that in the big lie there is always a
certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always
more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than
consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds
they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they
themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to
resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to
fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have
the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which
prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still
doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other
explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even
after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in
this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These people
know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes.
From time immemorial. However, the Jews
have known better than any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited.
Is not their very existence founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a
religious community, whereas in reality they are a race? And what a race! One
of the greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has branded the Jews for all
time with a statement which is profoundly and exactly true. He (Schopenhauer)
called the Jew "The Great Master of Lies". Those who do not realize
the truth of that statement, or do not wish to believe it, will never be able
to lend a hand in helping Truth to prevail.
We may regard it as a great stroke of fortune
for the German nation that its period of lingering suffering was so suddenly
curtailed and transformed into such a terrible catastrophe. For if things had
gone on as they were the nation would have more slowly, but more surely, gone
to ruin. The disease would have become chronic; whereas, in the acute form of
the disaster, it at least showed itself clearly to the eyes of a considerable
number of observers. It was not by accident that man conquered the black plague
more easily than he conquered tuberculosis. The first appeared in terrifying
waves of death that shook the whole of mankind, the other advances insidiously;
the first induces terror, the other gradual indifference. The result is,
however, that men opposed the first with all the energy they were capable of,
whilst they try to arrest tuberculosis by feeble means. Thus man has mastered
the black plague, while tuberculosis still gets the better of him.”
Adolf
Hitler
Kaps
Kapel, could you please right a book which concludes the truth behind the Holocaust and how WW2 was really started. I am pretty much saying put all of your posts about Hitler and WW2 in a book. :)
ReplyDelete