Lies being taught;
Hitler had no knowledge of politics.
Now the Truth;
CHAPTER III
POLITICAL REFLECTIONS ARISING OUT OF
MY SOJOURN IN VIENNA.
“It was impossible to
make anything like a successful effort for the permanent consolidation of the
Austrian State unless a firm and persistent policy of centralization were put
into force. Before everything else the principle should have been adopted that
only one common language could be used as the official language of the State. Thus
it would be possible to emphasize the formal unity of that imperial commonwealth.
And thus the administration would have in its hands a technical instrument
without which the State could not endure as a political unity. In the same way
the school and other forms of education should have been used to inculcate a
feeling of common citizenship. Such an objective could not be reached within
ten or twenty years. The effort would have to be envisaged in terms of
centuries; just as in all problems of colonization, steady perseverance is a
far more important element than the output of energetic effort at the moment.
It goes without saying that in such circumstances the country must be governed and administered by strictly adhering to the principle of uniformity.
For me it was quite instructive to discover why this did not take place, or rather why it was not done. Those who were guilty of the omission must be held responsible for the break-up of the Habsburg Empire.
More than any other State, the existence of the old Austria depended on a strong and capable Government. The Habsburg Empire lacked ethnical uniformity, which constitutes the fundamental basis of a national State and will preserve the existence of such a State even though the ruling power should be grossly inefficient. When a State is composed of a homogeneous population, the natural inertia of such a population will hold the Stage together and maintain its existence through astonishingly long periods of misgovernment and maladministration. It may often seem as if the principle of life had died out in such a body-politic; but a time comes when the apparent corpse rises up and displays before the world an astonishing manifestation of its indestructible vitality.
But the situation is utterly different in a country where the population is not homogeneous, where there is no bond of common blood but only that of one ruling hand. Should the ruling hand show signs of weakness in such a State the result will not be to cause a kind of hibernation of the State but rather to awaken the individualist instincts which are slumbering in the ethnological groups. These instincts do not make themselves felt as long as these groups are dominated by a strong central will-to-govern. The danger which exists in these slumbering separatist instincts can be rendered more or less innocuous only through centuries of common education, common traditions and common interests. The younger such States are, the more their existence will depend on the ability and strength of the central government. If their foundation was due only to the work of a strong personality or a leader who is a man of genius, in many cases they will break up as soon as the founder disappears; because, though great, he stood alone. But even after centuries of a common education and experiences these separatist instincts I have spoken of are not always completely overcome. They may be only dormant and may suddenly awaken when the central government shows weakness and the force of a common education as well as the prestige of a common tradition prove unable to withstand the vital energies of separatist nationalities forging ahead towards the shaping of their own individual existence.
It goes without saying that in such circumstances the country must be governed and administered by strictly adhering to the principle of uniformity.
For me it was quite instructive to discover why this did not take place, or rather why it was not done. Those who were guilty of the omission must be held responsible for the break-up of the Habsburg Empire.
More than any other State, the existence of the old Austria depended on a strong and capable Government. The Habsburg Empire lacked ethnical uniformity, which constitutes the fundamental basis of a national State and will preserve the existence of such a State even though the ruling power should be grossly inefficient. When a State is composed of a homogeneous population, the natural inertia of such a population will hold the Stage together and maintain its existence through astonishingly long periods of misgovernment and maladministration. It may often seem as if the principle of life had died out in such a body-politic; but a time comes when the apparent corpse rises up and displays before the world an astonishing manifestation of its indestructible vitality.
But the situation is utterly different in a country where the population is not homogeneous, where there is no bond of common blood but only that of one ruling hand. Should the ruling hand show signs of weakness in such a State the result will not be to cause a kind of hibernation of the State but rather to awaken the individualist instincts which are slumbering in the ethnological groups. These instincts do not make themselves felt as long as these groups are dominated by a strong central will-to-govern. The danger which exists in these slumbering separatist instincts can be rendered more or less innocuous only through centuries of common education, common traditions and common interests. The younger such States are, the more their existence will depend on the ability and strength of the central government. If their foundation was due only to the work of a strong personality or a leader who is a man of genius, in many cases they will break up as soon as the founder disappears; because, though great, he stood alone. But even after centuries of a common education and experiences these separatist instincts I have spoken of are not always completely overcome. They may be only dormant and may suddenly awaken when the central government shows weakness and the force of a common education as well as the prestige of a common tradition prove unable to withstand the vital energies of separatist nationalities forging ahead towards the shaping of their own individual existence.
The failure to see the
truth of all this constituted what may be called the tragic crime of the
Habsburg rulers.
Only before the eyes
of one Habsburg ruler, and that for the last time, did the hand of Destiny hold
aloft the torch that threw light on the future of his country. But the torch
was then extinguished for ever.
Joseph II, Roman
Emperor of the German nation, was filled with a growing anxiety when he
realized the fact that his House was removed to an outlying frontier of his
Empire and that the time would soon be at hand when it would be overturned and
engulfed in the whirlpool caused by that Babylon of nationalities, unless
something was done at the eleventh hour to overcome the dire consequences
resulting from the negligence of his ancestors. With superhuman energy this
'Friend of Mankind' made every possible effort to counteract the effects of the
carelessness and thoughtlessness of his predecessors. Within one decade he
strove to repair the damage that had been done through centuries. If Destiny
had only granted him forty years for his labours, and if only two generations
had carried on the work which he had started, the miracle might have been
performed. But when he died, broken in body and spirit after ten years of
rulership, his work sank with him into the grave and rests with him there in
the Capucin Crypt, sleeping its eternal sleep, having never again showed signs
of awakening.
His successors had
neither the ability nor the will-power necessary for the task they had to face.”
Adolf Hitler
No comments:
Post a Comment