New Age History and Economics

The Day We See The Truth And Cease To Speak it, Is The Day We Begin To Die. MLK Jr.

Wednesday, April 11, 2012

Truth About Zimmerman Telegram - How USA is tricked into War - False Flag


Lies being taught;

Zimmerman telegram was Germany telling Mexico during World War I that if they attacked the US, Germany would make sure they got back Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona. In an act of retribution USA entered into World War 1 on the side of England and crushed Germany.

Now the truth;

The telegram inter-alia states;
We intend to begin unrestricted submarine warfare on the first of February. We shall endeavor in spite of this to keep the United States neutral. In the event of this not succeeding, we make Mexico a proposal of an alliance on the following basis: Make war together, make peace together, generous financial support, and an understanding on our part that Mexico is to re-conquer the lost territory in Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona. The settlement detail is left to you. “

Thus the telegram is only conditional to come into effect if and only if USA declares war on Germany. If you believe the telegram, then you have to believe Germany did not want war with America -- It says so.

Mexico was to declare war on America, IF AND ONLY if America declared war on Germany. One act of Yankee aggression would then justify another act of aggression, right? 



Following are undisputed facts;-

1)     Germany did not want war with America

2)     Mexico never had a Military worth the name.

3)      Mexico declined the offer

So why all this hype.

The Zimmerman Telegram had a far more effective impact for the German cause in being intercepted, than if it had not been intercepted.

British and American authorities would obviously then make a big deal of it, at a time that very most people in America were worried that British intelligence was manipulating American media into supporting America getting into the war.

It would have been a fantastic way to create doubt and in-fighting in America vis-a –vis, England greatly reducing USA’s morale to fight.

And it had no effect, but then Zimmerman admitted the telegram thus screwing up a perfect "disinformation" campaign by confessing ?

Why did Zimmerman make a a complete mockery and fools of leading American Isolationists of the day, the chief "conspiracy nuts" being such notable American icons as trusted Henry Ford and American hero Charles Lindbergh.

Why did he admit it what he had done when he could have just remained silent and let Americans ridicule England for faking telegrams ?

Anyone who researches Arthur Zimmerman as the cause of America "entering" WW1 should also realize that Zimmerman was also the cause of Russia "exiting" WW1.

And strangely enough, Russia was exiting the war against Zimmerman's Germany at the exact same time America was entering the war against Zimmerman's Germany.

Any serious student of history would want to understand such a strange relationship of conflicting interests in the same man.

For the part about America "entering" the World War, America would declare war on Germany just three days after German Foreign Secretary Arther Zimmerman admitted to sending a telegram to Mexico promising an alliance against America should America declare war on Germany.

The fact that Zimmerman openly and freely admitted to the deed, when he could have just said it was Woodrow Wilson's "war conspiracy theory" talking, raises serious questions about the German leader's loyalty to Germany.

And a German official mysteriously committing such a bizarre treasonous act against his own country should have given everyone in America pause to rethink what we were getting ourselves into.

1.     Because World War 1 was not about England and its allies versus Germany But it was about Jewish world domination and takeover of Jerusalem by England and to hand it over to Jews and to install Jewish control over last remaining monarchies of Austro-Hungry, Russia and Germany.

2.     Because Arthur Zimmerman the author of Telegram and then State Secretary for Foreign Affairs of the Germany was a German Jew and Zionist.

3.     Because he was instrumental in helping Lenin and his Jewish band of Bolsheviks travel through Germany's, in his own train loaded with 20 million in gold, for Jewish takeover of Russia and kill Christian Czar Nichols II of Russia.

4.     Because, He confessed to it after being assured by amongst others by fellow Zionists Chairn Weizmann and others that they have got an assurance from England that if Zionists can bring USA into war, England will support and give Jerusalem to Jews. England did keep its promise to Zionists including Arthur Zimmerman when after a few months of US entry into World War1 it gave Jews “Balfour Declaration”.

5.     Because the Zionist Jews had been negotiating with Britain, Winston Churchill being their esteemed spokesman, to have the Balfour Declaration put in writing.

6.     Because During the first meeting between Weizmann and Balfour in 1906, Balfour asked what Weizmann's objections were to the idea of a Jewish homeland in Uganda, rather than in Palestine. According to Weizmann's memoir, the conversation went as follows:
"Mr. Balfour, supposing I was to offer you Paris instead of London, would you take it?" He sat up, looked at me, and answered: "But Dr. Weizmann, we have London." "That is true," I said, "but we had Jerusalem when London was a marsh. I believe I speak the mind of millions of Jews whom you will never see and who cannot speak for themselves."

Here is the text of The Balfour Declaration.

"Foreign Office. November 2nd, 1917. Dear Lord Rothschild.

I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet.

'His Majesty's Government view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.'

I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.

Yours sincerely. Arthur James Balfour". 




Statement to Parliament in 1922 by Winston Churchill, then colonial secretary, that it should not be thought that, in the Balfour Declaration, Britain gave something to the Jews for which she received nothing in return. England issued the Balfour Declaration in exchange, not for something she hoped would happen in the future, but for something that had already happened in the past.

When asked by William Yale, of the US State Department what the Jews would do if the British failed to live up to their agreement, Chaim Weizmann retorted, "If they don’t, we’ll smash the British Empire like we smashed the Russian Empire.”

But it took another world war, (1939-1945) and death of 72 million more before England gave them Jerusalem in 1948. Zionists Jews through their poodle Winston Churchill did smash the British Empire which ended within a decade thereafter.

Zionists Jews do not work or are loyal to the country in which they live whether it be Germany, England, USA or France or any other country in which they live. They only work for the best interests of Israel, wherever they are. Same as in current days, they successfully pushed America into wars with Iraq, Afghanistan and soon Iran, all to protect Israel.

Major causes of the chronic instability that has bedeviled the Middle East since the fall of the Ottoman Empire are the conflicting agreements into which Britain entered during World War I. The British promised the Arabs independence in return for their help against the Ottoman Turks. The British also entered into the secret Sykes-Picot agreement with their allies, the French (and originally with Czarist Russia as well), dividing the same areas that the Arabs thought were to be independent into British and French spheres of influence. These agreements undisputedly were designed to create or reinforce British alliances against the Ottoman Empire, which was allied with Germany. Finally, however, the British government issued the Balfour Declaration proclaiming that "His Majesty's Government view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of the existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine or the rights and political status of Jews in any other country." Historians describe the negotiation of this third agreement which, in addition to its obvious internal conflict between the rights of "the Jewish people" and "the existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine," also was in conflict with Britain's other two secret agreements.

Now read the complete Truth;

Chronology;

Dec. 7, 1916—David Lloyd George becomes prime minister of Great Britain and quickly imposes a war dictatorship. C.P. Scott, editor of the Manchester Guardian, who had, according to Fromkin, been “converted to Zionism” in 1914 by Chaim Weizmann, was considered Lloyd George’s closest political confidant. A so-called War Cabinet is subsequently formed with Sir Mark Sykes as chief secretary. Sykes was the co-author of the then-secret Sykes-Picot agreement which established which areas of Syria and Palestine were to be British and which French after the war.

Jan. 9, 1917—German government makes the decision to begin unrestricted submarine warfare on February 1.

Jan. 16, 1917 —Zimmerman Note sent, encoded, from Berlin to the German ambassador in Washington in newly create code 7500. British did not knew how to decipher or brake this new code 7500.

Jan. 19, 1917—Zimmerman Note forwarded with some changes, encoded, from the German Embassy in Washington to the German legation in Mexico City by Western Union telegram in old code 13040, which had been broken by British. German Embassy send the telegram in old code as presumably German embassy in Mexico did not have new code 7500.

Late January 1917—Chaim Weizmann is first introduced to Mark Sykes, submits to him a memorandum prepared by a committee of Zionists, and has several preliminary conferences with him The memorandum was entitled “Outline of Program for the Jewish Resettlement of Palestine in Accordance with the Aspirations of the Zionist Movement” and, according to Weizmann, “does seem to have anticipated the shape of things to come.”

January 25, 1917 – Woodrow Wilson began his 2nd term as President of USA. His close confident was Rothschild agent Col. Edward Mandell House.

Jan. 31, 1917—Germany announces unrestricted submarine warfare against Britain, to begin the following day.

Feb. 3, 1917—U.S. breaks off diplomatic relations with Germany. The German ambassador, Count Bernstorff, is given his passport and told to leave the U.S.

Feb. 7, 1917 —Weizmann and other Zionist leaders again meets Sykes.

Feb. 14, 1917—German Ambassador in USA, Count Bernstorff leaves New York on the Danish steamer Friedrich VIII bound for Copenhagen. Bernstorff and his party had been granted safe conduct by the British on condition that the ship stop for inspection at Halifax, Nova Scotia. At the time of the Lusitania sinking in 1915, Bernstorff had, as the result of a long conversation with President Wilson, had singlehandedly prevented war between Germany and the U.S. This had been a great disappointment to the British, who had, as a result, wanted him removed from the scene.

Feb. 16, 1917—The Friedrich VIII enters Halifax harbor. Passengers and ship inspected and held for almost 2 weeks, with no communication with the outside world.

Feb. 17, 1917—First full conference leading to the Balfour Declaration. Present were: Rabbi Gaster, Lord Rothschild, Herbert Samuel, James de Rothschild, Nabum Sokolow, Joseph Cowen, Herbert Bentwich, Harry Sacher, Chaim Weizmann and, from the British government, Sir Mark Sykes, ostensibly in an unofficial capacity. At that meeting a formal agreement would have been signed by both the British and the Zionists, the terms of the Balfour Declaration would have been agreed to, and it would have been agreed that Britain would formally issue the Balfour Declaration within some specified period of time. On their side, the exact text of the original Berlin-to-Washington Zimmerman telegram was given to Sykes by Chaim Weizmann who supposedly got it from his counterparts in Germany. Arthur Zimmerman the author of telegram is himself was a Jew and Zionist.

Feb. 23, 1917—US ambassador Walter page is given copy of the telegram in German along with its English text.

Feb. 24, 1917—The U.S. State Department receives a telegram from London containing an English translation of the text of the Zimmerman Note.

Feb. 27, 1917Friedrich VIII permitted to sail from Halifax.

March 1, 1917 —Text of the Zimmerman Note published in U.S.

March 27, 1917 – Trotsky leaves New York with 20 million in gold 

March 29, 1917 – Arthur Zimmerman admits Zimmerman Cable.

April 2, 1917 – Zimmerman Telegram cited to congress as cause for war even though Mexico had already declined it.

April 3, 1917 – Lenin thanks Zimmerman for February Revolution in Russia.

April 6, 1917—U.S. declares war on Germany because of Zimmerman telegram.

April 1917 —British General Allenby commissioned by Lloyd George to invade and occupy Palestine and to take Jerusalem before Christmas.

April 16, 1917—Weizmann is dismayed to learn of the Sykes-Picot agreement to divide Palestine between Britain and France, after the war, in a way incompatible with Zionist aspirations, but comes to realize that the British government was giving priority to its agreements with the Zionists over those with the French.

April 29, 1917 – Trotsky released by Winston Churchill from Halifax and arrives in Russia on May 4, 1917. He along with 20 million in Gold is allowed to travel through Germany in train owned by Zimmerman a fellow Zionist for eventual Jewish takeover of Russia.

October 25, 1917; Jews take complete control of Russia

Nov. 2, 1917—British government issues the Balfour Declaration.

Dec. 11, 1917—General Allenby enters Jerusalem.

Sources;-








Sunday, April 8, 2012

Freemasonry in News - BBC

FREEMASONRY IN NEWS

BBC: The following was published on Thursday, March 5, 1998 at 14:00 GMT The front page news across all Newspapers of UK. Mr Jack Straw the then Home Secretary is currently the Foreign Secretary of Britain.

UK: Politics: BBC March 5, 1998 14.00 GMT

“New judges must declare masonic membership

Jack Straw's move follows a 1997 Home Affairs Committee report into masons and the judiciary.

Freemasons who join the police or judiciary in England have to declare their membership of the ancient fraternal society. The move, which was introduced last month by Home Secretary Jack Straw, means serving judges will also be asked to make a voluntary declaration but will not be compelled to do so. It will also apply to magistrates, crown prosecutors, prison staff and probation officers.

Mr Straw said recently that the government would create a register of masons working in the criminal justice system unless they were prepared to name themselves. He said: "Membership of secret societies such as freemasonry can raise suspicions of a lack of impartiality or objectivity. It is therefore important the public know the facts."

A society with secrets

Mr Straw added: "I think it is the case that the Freemasons said they are not a secret society but a society with secrets. "I think it is widely accepted that one secret they should not be keeping is who their members are in the criminal justice system."

Last year's Home Affairs Committee report into “Freemasons in the Police and the Judiciary" found widespread suspicion about masonic links.


It recommended judges and police officers be forced to declare masonic membership but the measure was delayed for months because of a row between Mr Straw and the Lord Chancellor, Lord Irvine, over whether judges should be included. The compromise falls short of forcing existing judges to declare their interest immediately.

English freemasonry 'oldest in the world'

Some masonic historians have controversially traced freemasonry and its rituals directly from the time of Jesus Christ through the Knights Templar to the present day.

The United Grand Lodge of England, founded in 1717, claims to be the oldest masonic order in the world. In 1984 it declared it was becoming an "open" organisation to dispel the myths that have grown over the years. In a leaflet distributed at that time, it said: "Freemasonry is a society of men concerned with moral and spiritual values. Its members are taught its precepts by a series of ritual dramas, which follow ancient forms and use stonemasons' customs and tools as allegorical guides.

"The essential qualification for admission into and continuing membership is a belief in a Supreme Being. Membership is open to men of any race or religion who can fulfil this essential qualification and are of good repute."

 Three principles

 Freemasons, the lodge said, follow three principles of brotherly love, relief and truth and practice charity. It went on the deny the extent of masonic secrecy, which had caused much of the speculation about the true nature of the organization.

"The secrets of freemasonry are concerned with its traditional modes of recognition. It is not a secret society, since all members are free to acknowledge their membership and will do so in response to inquiries for respectable reasons," it said. But the Home Affairs Committee disagreed. It described freemasonry as a secret society.

Mutual advancement

It said masonic lodges were run on the basis of mutual advancement and favour-swapping. Senior barrister Elizabeth Woodcraft says lack of knowledge remains a problem surrounding the masons. "The troubling thing about the masonic movement or organization is that we don't know very much about it. But what we do know is that organization requires loyalty and adherence to a set of values that may be in conflict with the values and the requirements of justice," she said.

She said the danger was the public might believe a judge would be lenient on defendants who were masons, even if this did not happen. Suspicions could also be raised about Masonic connections advancing careers within the judiciary. "There is an anxiety that because judges are chosen in secret that there is perhaps something a little worrying about how that goes on," Ms Woodcraft said.

One judge who admits being a mason, Lord Justice Millett, denies favors are asked for or granted by judges. "I've never known whether anybody who's appeared before me on the bench was a mason and they've never known that I was one. And if I had, it wouldn't have made the slightest bit of difference," he said.

He added: “There's nothing slightly above the law about being a mason."
              

UK: Politics: BBC, 8 December, 2001 15:10 GMT

Freemason policy review due

Welsh Assembly could be about to announce a U-turn over its tough policy on Freemasons declaring their membership. Two years ago, the assembly became the only body in the UK to place a legal requirement on membership declaration of the men-only organization.

The assembly's standards of conduct committee meets on Wednesday to reconsider the requirement and could recommend it is cancelled.
The policy was agreed by AMs two years ago - following public consultations - in a bid to prevent "undue influence" being used in the assembly. The decision was ushered in under the leadership of the then Assembly First Secretary Alun Michael.
But Hugh Johns of the Masonic Province of South Wales claims that Freemasons will now fall into same category as trade union members, who do not declare their membership.

In April, prominent Freemasons complained the policy of compulsory declaration was illegal. The organization turned to the new Human Rights Act to challenge the decision. 

Presiding officer Lord Elis-Thomas has previously received complaints about the policy. James Bevan, the Provincial Grand Secretary of the Provincial Grand Lodge of South Wales, said the policy contravened the Human Rights Act 1998, which came into force in October 2000. 

He told the standards of conduct committee in April that Wales had waited 300 years for some sort of parliament. But he complained that one of its first acts was "imposing a Masonic Welsh knot around our necks".
"We are hoping that common sense will prevail here and that we will get fair play down at the assembly," said Mr Bevan. 

Labour AM Christine Gwyther said there was public concern about Freemasons because they had existed "in the shadows" for so many years.

Kaps.

Sunday, April 1, 2012

Understanding Mein Kampf - Chapter I, Memories of Childhood.



Lies being taught;
Hitler was Psychic, deranged mental nut;
Now the truth;

Understanding Hitler

Excerpts from his Book “ Mein Kampf” "Memories of childhood; 
CHAPTER I
IN THE HOME OF MY PARENTS;

"It has turned out fortunate for me to-day that destiny appointed Braunau-on-the-Inn to be my birthplace. For that little town is situated just on the frontier between those two States the reunion of which seems, at least to us of the younger generation, a task to which we should devote our lives and in the pursuit of which every possible means should be employed.

German-Austria must be restored to the great German Motherland, and not indeed on any grounds of economic calculation whatsoever. No, no. Even if the union were a matter of economic indifference, and even if it were to be disadvantageous from the economic standpoint, still it ought to take place. People of the same blood should be in the same REICH. The German people will have no right to engage in a colonial policy until they shall have brought all their children together in the one State. When the territory of the REICH embraces all the Germans and finds itself unable to assure them a livelihood, only then can the moral right arise, from the need of the people to acquire foreign territory. The plough is then the sword; and the tears of war will produce the daily bread for the generations to come.

So this little frontier town appeared to me as the symbol of a great task. But in another regard also it points to a lesson that is applicable to our day. Over a hundred years ago this sequestered spot was the scene of a tragic calamity which affected the whole German nation and will be remembered for ever, at least in the annals of German history. At the time of our Fatherland's deepest humiliation a bookseller, Johannes Palm, uncompromising nationalist and enemy of the French, was put to death here because he had the misfortune to have loved Germany well. He obstinately refused to disclose the names of his associates, or rather the principals who were chiefly responsible for the affair, just as it happened with Leo Schlageter. The former, like the latter, was denounced to the French by a Government agent. It was a director of police from Augsburg who won an ignoble renown on that occasion and set the example which was to be copied at a later date by the neo-German officials of the REICH under Herr Severing's regime (Note 1).
[Note 1. In order to understand the reference here, and similar references in later portions of MEIN KAMPF, the following must be borne in mind:
From 1792 to 1814 the French Revolutionary Armies overran Germany. In 1800 Bavaria shared in the Austrian defeat at Hohenlinden and the French occupied Munich. In 1805 the Bavarian Elector was made King of Bavaria by Napoleon and stipulated to back up Napoleon in all his wars with a force of 30,000 men. Thus Bavaria became the absolute vassal of the French. This was 'The Time of Germany's Deepest Humiliation', Which is referred to again and again by Hitler.

In 1806 a pamphlet entitled 'Germany's Deepest Humiliation' was published in South Germany. Among those who helped to circulate the pamphlet was the N├╝rnberg bookseller, Johannes Philipp Palm. He was denounced to the French by a Bavarian police agent. At his trial he refused to disclose the name of the author. By Napoleon's orders, he was shot at Braunau-on-the-Inn on August 26th, 1806. A monument erected to him on the site of the execution was one of the first public objects that made an impression on Hitler as a little boy.

Leo Schlageter's case was in many respects parallel to that of Johannes Palm. Schlageter was a German theological student who volunteered for service in 1914. He became an artillery officer and won the Iron Cross of both classes. When the French occupied the Ruhr in 1923 Schlageter helped to organize the passive resistance on the German side. He and his companions blew up a railway bridge for the purpose of making the transport of coal to France more difficult.

Those who took part in the affair were denounced to the French by a German informer. Schlageter took the whole responsibility on his own shoulders and was condemned to death, his companions being sentenced to various terms of imprisonment and penal servitude by the French Court. Schlageter refused to disclose the identity of those who issued the order to blow up the railway bridge and he would not plead for mercy before a French Court. He was shot by a French firing-squad on May 26th, 1923. Severing was at that time German Minister of the Interior. It is said that representations were made, to him on Schlageter's behalf and that he refused to interfere.

Schlageter has become the chief martyr of the German resistance to the French occupation of the Ruhr and also one of the great heroes of the National Socialist Movement. He had joined the Movement at a very early stage, his card of membership bearing the number 61.]

In this little town on the Inn, haloed by the memory of a German martyr, a town that was Bavarian by blood but under the rule of the Austrian State, my parents were domiciled towards the end of the last century. My father was a civil servant who fulfilled his duties very conscientiously. My mother looked after the household and lovingly devoted herself to the care of her children. From that period I have not retained very much in my memory; because after a few years my father had to leave that frontier town which I had come to love so much and take up a new post farther down the Inn valley, at Passau, therefore actually in Germany itself.

Browsing through my father's books, I chanced to come across some publications that dealt with military subjects. One of these publications was a popular history of the Franco-German War of 1870-71. It consisted of two volumes of an illustrated periodical dating from those years. These became my favorite reading. In a little while that great and heroic conflict began to take first place in my mind. And from that time onwards I became more and more enthusiastic about everything that was in any way connected with war or military affairs.

But this story of the Franco-German War had a special significance for me on other grounds also. For the first time, and as yet only in quite a vague way, the question began to present itself: Is there a difference--and if there be, what is it--between the Germans who fought that war and the other Germans? Why did not Austria also take part in it? Why did not my father and all the others fight in that struggle? Are we not the same as the other Germans? Do we not all belong together?

That was the first time that this problem began to agitate my small brain. And from the replies that were given to the questions which I asked very tentatively, I was forced to accept the fact, though with a secret envy, that not all Germans had the good luck to belong to Bismarck's Empire. This was something that I could not understand."

Adolf Hitler

End of Chapter 1.

To be continued … to Excerpts from Chapter II

for the complete book read here;- 

http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks02/0200601.txt