New Age History and Economics

The Day We See The Truth And Cease To Speak it, Is The Day We Begin To Die. MLK Jr.

Friday, October 22, 2010

Who assassinated John F Kennedy on November 22, 1963

                     THE FREEMEN  

Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who write the laws.   - Mayer Amschel Rothschild

Dear Brethren,
Lies being taught;

John F Kennedy was assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald through Russian Links.

Now the truth;
Today’s issue is dedicated to finding the reasons which led to the assassination of John Fitzgerald Kennedy  the thirty fifth President of United states of America.

"...In our times this control of the issuance of our currency is in the illegal hands of the Federal Reserve, called the Fed, and the principal owner of the Fed's "Class A" stock is--you guessed it--the Rothschild family. The other president brave enough to oppose the banker barons, whose worth was now in the trillions, was President John F. Kennedy..."
"...President Kennedy pledged himself to what was the best for America and cared not how the greedy bankers of the Fed felt. JFK, like Lincoln in the 1860's. dared to have the U. S. Treasury issue U. S. Dollars, not Federal Reserve notes, and placed them into circulation without paying interest to any bankers, just as spelled out in the U. S. Constitution...".

On June 4, 1963, President John Fitzgerald Kennedy signed Executive Order 11110, with the intention to strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business.  When President John Fitzgerald Kennedy - the author of Profiles in Courage -signed this Order, it returned to the federal government, specifically the Treasury Department, the Constitutional power to create and issue currency -money - without going through the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. President Kennedy's Executive Order 11110 [the full text is displayed further below] gave the Treasury Department the explicit authority: "to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury." This means that for every ounce of silver in the U.S. Treasury's vault, the government could introduce new money into circulation based on the silver bullion physically held there. As a result, more than $4 billion in United States Notes were brought into circulation in $2 and $5 denominations. $10 and $20 United States Notes were never circulated but were being printed by the Treasury Department when Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963.

President Kennedy knew that the Federal Reserve Notes being circulated as "legal currency" were contrary to the Constitution of the United States, which calls for issuance of "United States Notes" as interest-free and debt-free currency backed by silver reserves in the U.S. Treasury. Comparing a "Federal Reserve Note" issued from the private central bank of the United States, with a "United States Note" from the U.S. Treasury (as issued by President Kennedy's Executive Order), the two almost look alike, except one says "Federal Reserve Note" on the top while the other says "United States Note". In addition, the Federal Reserve Note has a green seal and serial number while the United States Note has a red seal and serial number.
Mr. Kennedy was on his way to putting privately owned Federal Reserve Bank of New York out of business. If enough of these silver certificates were to come into circulation they would have eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve notes. This is because the silver certificates are backed by silver and the Federal Reserve notes are not backed by anything. Executive Order 11110 could have prevented the national debt from reaching its current level, because it would have given the government the ability to repay its debt without going to the Federal Reserve and being charged interest in order to create the new money. Executive Order 11110 gave the U.S. the ability to create its own money backed by silver. The current national Debt of US is $ 13.62 Trillion

Five months later when $10 and $20 dollar USN were still under printing, President Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963. $10 ans $20 Dollar were taken out of printing. United states notes of $2 and $5 were immediately withdrawn from circulation. No more "Silver Certificates" were issued. Federal Reserve Notes continued to serve as the legal currency of the nation. 99% of all U.S. paper "currency" circulating today are Federal Reserve Notes.

The assassination of JFK was a warning to all future presidents not to interfere with the private Federal Reserve's control over the creation of money. Mr. Kennedy challenged the government of money by challenging the two most successful vehicles that have ever been used to drive up debt;- 
1) war (Vietnam--On October 11, 1963, Kennedy approved National Security Action Memorandum 263, which approved disengagement in Vietnam by the  end of 1965 and had ordered a quiet withdrawal of some military personnel by the end of the year" (Marrs);
2) the creation of money by a privately owned central bank. His efforts to have all U.S. troops out of Vietnam by 1965 combined with Executive Order 11110 would have destroyed the profits and control of the private Federal Reserve Bank.

Executive Order 11110 has never been repealed by any U.S. President through an Executive Order and is still valid. Why then has no president utilized it? If a U.S. president had utilized Executive Order 11110 the debt would be nowhere near the current level of $13.62 Trillion.

Executive Order 11110 AMENDMENT OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 10289


By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 301 of Title 3 of the United States Code, it is ordered as follows:
SECTION 1. Executive Order No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, as amended, is hereby further amended
(a) By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j):
"(j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the Act of May 12, 1933, as amended (31 U.S.C. 821 (b)), to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denominations of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption,"
(b) By revoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof. 
SECTION 2. The amendment made by this Order shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if said amendments had not been made.

June 4, 1963 

President Abraham Lincoln monetary policy, 1865 (Page 91 of Senate document 23) “Money is the creature of Law and the creation of original issue of money should be maintained as an exclusive monopoly of national Government.
"The money power preys upon the nation in time of peace and conspires against it in times of adversity. It is more despotic than monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, more selfish than bureaucracy. I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me, and causes me to tremble for the safety of our country. Corporations have been enthroned, an era of corruption will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people, until the wealth is aggregated in a few hands, and the republic is destroyed. "
President Lincoln was assassinated on April 14, 1865.
President Garfield openly declared that whoever controls the supply of currency would control the business and activities of all the people. After only four months in office, President Garfield was shot at a railroad station on July 2, 1881. Another coincidence. 

A Government which cannot face a challenge of war ends. Wars are always financed by debt. Greater the war or even a threat of war, greater the debt. – Steve Barry.

Kaps ; Those (MONEYERS) who provide this debt not only end up owning the people but also make huge profits for themselves.

Lyndon B Johnson took over as President on November 22, 1963.  The very first task he did was to stop printing of US Notes / silver dollars as ordered by JF Kennedy. Next he withdrew from circulation all the existing US Notes issued by JF Kennedy so far. Next and the last he appointed his friend J Edgar Hoover head FBI to investigate every aspect of assassination of JF Kennedy.

Well why you think he did what he did ??
Yes, You are right; Both Lyndon B Johnson and J Edgar Hoover were members of Jewish Secret society - The FREMASONS. Check the link below for evidence;- 
When president of the Country and director of its Investigation are involved in assassination then what do we have – a massive cover-up and a scapegoat – Lee Harvey Oswald.

John F Kennedy said this about Freemasons – the Jewish secret society; “The very word ‘secrecy’ is repugnant in a free and open society, and we as people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings”.
what others say about Lyndon Johnson being behind assassination of JFK;
"The night before the Kennedy assassination, Lyndon Baines Johnson met with Dallas tycoons, FBI moguls and organized crime kingpins – emerging from the conference to tell his mistress Madeleine Duncan Brown that "those SOB’s” (means Kennedy's) would never embarrass him again. It’s a jaw-dropping deposition and it’s the biggest JFK smoking gun there is – despite the fact that it has received little media attention."

Next article - Who owns Federal Reserve –Watch it next month.


Friday, October 15, 2010

Ayodhya belongs to Lord Ram/Hindus

                       THE FREEMEN

Dear Brethren,

Ayodhya is to Hindus what Mecca & Medina is to Islam. Lord Ram was born on January 10, 5114 BC.

Ramayana was written in 400 BC which described Ayodhya as birthplace of Lord Ram ;

Prophet Mohamed was born some time 570/571 AD i.e almost 5600 years after birth of Lord Ram and 1000 years after Ramayana was written which described Ayodhya as birth place of Ram.
Its a case of simple arithmetic yet for the purpose of Muslims votes disputes lingers on. Will Muslims allow a church to be built at Mecca and Medina ? If not then Ayodhya belongs to Hindus the same way Mecca belongs to Muslims.

The Other Turkish name of Babri Mosque is "Masjid E Janmasthan" means "Mosque in the Birthplace" . That clearly indicates that the Mosque was built on the birthplace of Lord Ram.

The Judgement  on lord Ram birthplace was given after an issue was framed as to whether
a)   Disputed site was in fact the  Birth Place of Lord Ram
b)   The structure built by Mir baki was after demolition of an existing Hindu Temple at disputed site.

Archaeological excavations by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) in 1970, 1992 and 2003 in and around the disputed site clearly found the evidence indicating that a large Hindu complex existed on the site. In 2003, by the order of an Indian Court, The Archaeological Survey of India was asked to conduct a more in depth study and an excavation to ascertain the type of structure that was beneath the rubble. The summary of the ASI report indicated definite proof of a huge Temple under the mosque. In the words of ASI researchers, they discovered "distinctive features associated with... temples of north India". The excavations yielded: 
"stone and decorated bricks as well as mutilated sculpture of a divine couple and carved architectural features, including foliage patterns, amalaka, kapotapali, doorjamb with semi-circular shrine pilaster, broke octagonal shaft of black schist pillar, lotus motif, circular shrine having pranjala (watershute) in the north and 50 pillar bases in association with a huge structure..”

The Indian High Court while giving its Judgment relied upon the report of Archaeological survey of India to decide the above issues in favor of Hindus. i.e. Mosque was built after demolition of Hindu Temple. 
The Judgment though  only gives 2/3 satisfaction to Hindus who hope that remaining 1/3rd satisfaction shall be given either by Muslims or by Supreme court of India.

Ayodhya prompts several thoughts relating to the Temple Mount. It shows that the Temple Mount dispute is far from unique. Muslims have habitually asserted the supremacy of Islam through architecture, building on top of the monuments of other faiths (as in Jerusalem and Ayodhya) or appropriating them (e.g. the Ka'ba in Mecca and the Hagia Sophia in Constantinople or ground Zero in New York).

I wish my all those Muslim brothers for their prosperity and happiness for accepting Sri Ram Mandir and showing tolerance in the world's largest democratic country.  Because I believe that even BIG BROTHERS also have some demands which needs to be fulfilled and cannot be expected to sacrifice EVERYTIME. Secularism doesn't mean SACRIFICE done by MAJORITY only.

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

World war 1 ends on october 3rd 2010

                       THE FREEMEN

Dear Brethren,

Isn't it amazing that 90 years after the end of world war 1, Germany is paying money to Americans / French towards its "Guilt" over the war which war was fought by all the countries at their cost or was it foretold to Germany that America or France is conducting the War at cost of Germany.

Will America pay billions of dollars to Iraq or Afghanistan where its trigger happy contractors have killed millions of innocent children, women and men. A war which was thrust on Iraq on false premises by George Bush. What type of freedom do Iraqis have today if they do not receive billions of American funds over America's War Guilt or do we still live in Jungle where powerful rules at the cost of freedom of the weak.

World War I ended over the weekend. Germany made its final reparations-related payment for the Great War on Oct. 3, 2010 nearly 92 years after the country's defeat by the Allies. The payment has been made under the Treaty of Versailles. Why should Germany honor its commitment under Treaty of Versailles when French have made mockery of it. In the beginning of 1923 the French invaded Germany, occupied the Ruhr district and seized several German towns in the Rhineland. This was a flagrant breach of international law and was protested against by every section of British political opinion at that time. The Germans could not effectively defend themselves, as they had been already disarmed under the provisions of the Versailles Treaty. To make the situation more fraught with disaster for Germany, and therefore more appalling in its prospect, French carried on an intensive propaganda for the separation of the Rhineland from the German Republic and the establishment of an independent Rhenania. Money was poured out lavishly to bribe agitators to carry on this work, and some of the most insidious elements of the German population became active in the pay of the invader. At the same time a vigorous movement was being carried on in Bavaria for the secession of that country and the establishment of an independent Catholic monarchy there, under vassalage to France, as Napoleon had done when he made Maximilian the first King of Bavaria in 1805.

The separatist movement in the Rhineland went so far that some leading German politicians came out in favour of it, suggesting that if the Rhineland were thus ceded it might be possible for the German Republic to strike a bargain with the French in regard to Reparations. But in Bavaria the movement went even farther. And it was more far-reaching in its implications; for, if an independent Catholic monarchy couldbe set up in Bavaria, the next move would have been a union with Catholic German-Austria. possibly under a Habsburg King. Thus a Catholic BLOC would have been created which would extend from the Rhineland through Bavaria and Austria into the Danube Valley and would have been at least under the moral and military, if not the full political, hegemony of France. The dream seems fantastic now, but it was considered quite a practical thing in those fantastic times. The effect of putting such a plan into action would have meant the complete dismemberment of Germany; and that is what French diplomacy wanted.

By the autumn of 1923 the separatist movement in Bavaria was on the point of becoming an accomplished fact. General von Lossow, the Bavarian chief of the REICHSWEHR no longer took orders from Berlin. The flag of the German Republic was rarely to be seen, Finally, the Bavarian Prime Minister decided to proclaim an independent Bavaria and its secession from the German Republic. This was to have taken place on the eve of the Fifth Anniversary of the establishment of the German Republic (November 9th, 1918.)

Hitler staged a counter-stroke. For several days he had been mobilizing his storm battalions in the neighbourhood of Munich, intending to make a national demonstration and hoping that the REICHSWEHR would stand by him to prevent secession. Ludendorff was with him. And he thought that the prestige of the great German Commander in the World War would be sufficient to win the allegiance of the professional army.

A meeting had been announced to take place in the Bürgerbräu Keller on the night of November 8th. The Bavarian patriotic societies were gathered there, and the Prime Minister, Dr. von Kahr, started to read his official PRONUNCIAMENTO, \which practically amounted to a proclamation of Bavarian independence and secession from the Republic. While von Kahr was speaking Hitler entered the hall, followed by Ludendorff. And the meeting was broken up.

Next day the Nazi battalions took the street for the purpose of making a mass demonstration in favour of national union. They marched in massed formation, led by Hitler and Ludendorff. As they reached one of the central squares of the city the army opened fire on them. Sixteen of the marchers were instantly killed, and two died of their wounds in the local barracks of the REICHSWEHR. Several others were wounded also. Hitler fell on the pavement and broke a collar-bone. Ludendorff marched straight up to the soldiers who were firing from the barricade, but not a man dared draw a trigger on his old Commander.
Germany's last $94 million payment issued on Sunday isn't a direct reparations settlement but rather the final sum owed on bonds that were issued between 1924 and 1930 and sold to foreign (mostly American) investors but then never paid. The story of German reparations involves several payment plans, years of inflation, broken promises, canceled debts and a man named Adolf Hitler who flat out refused to give anyone anything.

Signed at the 1919 Paris Peace Conference, the Treaty of Versailles - the formal agreement that ended World War I - stripped Germany of its colonies overseas and the region of Alsace-Lorraine (now part of France), placed restrictions on its military and levied punitive damages for supposedly starting what was, at the time, the most destructive war the world had ever seen. "Large parts of Belgium and France were so destroyed by trench warfare that they looked desolate, like moonscapes, just huge areas of land where nothing remained," explains Stephen Schuker, professor of history at the University of Virginia and author of American "Reparations" to Germany, 1919-33. "They needed money to help rebuild the area."

But how do you put a price on war? Is it the property value of destroyed buildings? Rounds of ammunition shot? The cost in human life? It took two years for the international Reparations Commission to assess damages in relation to Germany's national wealth - after all, the payment plan needed to be affordable - and decide how much the government owed. The first reparation demands were 266 gold marks, which amounted to roughly $63 billion then (close to $768 billion today), although this was later reduced to $33 billion (about $402 billion today).

That's a lot of money. So much money, in fact, that British economist John Maynard Keynes famously stormed out of the Paris Peace Conference and penned The Economic Consequences of Peace, arguing that reparations would cripple Germany's economy. At the time, Keynes' opinion was largely supported, though many historians today believe that while burdensome, the fines could have been paid.

When it came time for Germany to make its first payment of $500 million in August 1921, it "just literally printed the paper money," says Schuker. "They gave it to the Reparations Commission saying essentially, 'O.K., here you go.'" In fact, Germany began printing money for everything. They printed so much money, knowingly devaluing their currency, that within a few years it "literally took a wheelbarrow of money to buy a loaf of bread," as Shucker puts it.

In 1924, an American banker named Charles Dawes outlined what came to be known as the Dawes Plan - a new reparations agreement under which U.S. banks such as J.P. Morgan issued bonds to private investors on behalf of Germany, which agreed to pay them back when the money became due. Dawes won the 1925 Nobel Peace Prize for his work on this plan. But when the first batch of bonds came due in 1928, Germany again defaulted. So in June 1929, a new plan was enacted, floating more U.S.-backed bonds and reducing Germany's payments to $28 billion paid out over 59 years.

When Adolf Hitler rose to power in 1933, he cancelled all reparations. "So there are all these bonds out there, held by private individuals, that instantly become worthless," says Schuker. "American citizens lost a lot of money." But as David Andelman, World Policy Journal editor and author of A Shattered Peace: Versailles 1919 and the Price We Pay Today, points out, "refusing to pay doesn't make an agreement null and void. The bonds, the agreement, still existed."
In June 1953, at an international meeting that came to be known as the London Agreement, a fractured West Germany offered to slowly pay back some of the bonds on which it had defaulted back in the 1920s, but said that it wouldn't pay everything until the country was one day reunified. In 1995, no longer divided, Germany took up the task of settling all its debts. "The Germans just agreed to do the right thing, as it were," says Andelman, although he is quick to point out that the interest on the unpaid bonds is now so high that it has been adjusted downward many times. On Oct. 3, Germany paid off the last installment of interest, finally settling its World War I accounts.


Friday, October 1, 2010

The Money lender


S No 1 /3             Originally published on 1st September 2006

A young man was passing by a money lender’s shop and the young man had heard that the money lender was a Freemason.

The young man went into the shop and said to the money lender. “I have heard that you are a Freemason. I am also a Freemason and I desperately need a loan of Rs 5,000/-. I shall pay you back within a week. Of course you don’t know me, but the fact that both of us are Freemasons should be good enough for you to lend me Rs five Thousand on my word to repay it back.”

The money lender looked at the young man and seeing that he appeared to be quite respectable, lent him Rs Five Thousand. Before the week was up the young man had repaid Rs five Thousand to the money lender.

About a year later the young man was being initiated in a Lodge – he had not really been a Freemason when he had borrowed Rs 5,000/- from the money lender. During the ceremony of Initiation the young man happened to look round the Lodge Room and saw the money Lender sitting with other members of the Lodge. He was very worried and wondered if he had been recognized by the Money Lender.

After the ceremony, the young man tried to keep away from the Money Lender, but to the young man’s surprise the money lender came up to him with outstretched hands and greeted him as a brother.

The money lender said, “I see that when I loaned you that Five Thousand a year ago you were not a Freemason.”

“No”, said the young man, somewhat embarrassed, “But when I saw your shop a year ago, and having heard that Freemasons were charitable people, I decided to see if this were true. You loaned me Rs 5,000/- and my conclusion was that Freemasons do help their brothers in distress and being impressed with this attitude, I decided to seek to become a Freemason. I hope you will forgive me for having lied to you a year ago.”

“Of course”, said the money lender. “In fact, I owe you an apology my self, because, at that time a year ago when you borrowed Rs 5,000/-, I was not myself a Freemason. But having heard that Freemasons were true to their word I decided to loan you Rs five thousand and see if you would pay it back as you then promised. When you did pay back the five thousand as you had agreed, I then decided that Freemasons do keep their word, so I sought to become a Freemason also. I was initiated at the last meeting of the Lodge!”

Moral of the story;-

There is enough goodness in all of us with or without being Freemasons.


“You have come to us bound, half-naked, and defenseless. You have no money with which to feed and Lodge yourself, no armor to ward off the blows of your enemies, no weapons with which to defend yourself.”

“Take comfort from the fact that all of your brothers are sworn to help you. If you are naked, we will clothe you. If you are hungry, we will feed you. We will shelter and protect you from your enemies. We will keep your secrets. Your call for help will never go unanswered.”