Wall Street International Bankers behind establishment of United Nations

Wall Street International Bankers behind establishment of United Nations in their quest for;

a) World Domination

b) Profits from unnecessary Wars @ Wars on False premises.

Quotes from the Book FDR- My Exploited Father-in-law by Curtis Dull.

Chapter XXII

Pg. 170:

I refer to the One Worlders Revolutionary Take over Program, implemented by the self styled United Nations on behalf of the world money powers, their sponsors. The concept of a global United Nations apparatus did not suddenly emerge out of thin air! Obviously, no one could have suddenly provided the vast sums of money needed to successfully promote it. Hence, the long planned for U.N. operation for self serving wars, a slick undertaking, was worth a great deal of money to a few people here and abroad, ambitious for more power and more wealth. Who? In 1919 at the Paris Peace Conference, held at Versailles, when "Peace" was featured by its noticeable absence, the League of Nations was unfolded. It was carefully planned by a foreign clique, to be sold to President Wilson and then, sold by him to this Country. World Bankers were its leading advocates and sponsors.

Not to be daunted by the failure of the League of Nations, this same high level, money clique decided to keep the "One-World" concept alive for self serving reasons, and promptly planned for a new vehicle, aided by plenty of spade work in advance, that looked ahead twenty five years or so to successfully trap the American people.

Pg. 170-171:

In order to make certain that there would be no possible slip this time, an organization was created by them called The Council On Foreign Relations (C.F.R.), to carefully train men for various areas of operation and to suitably mold their ideological, political, financial, military, and educational objectives. In London, England, there was also created a Counterpart called The Royal Institute of International Affairs. The World phase of these two groups is known as The Bilderbergers, headed by H.R.H. Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands. Its headquarters are often in Holland.

Pg. 171:

The first important financial donation to the C.F.R., and there had to be a first one, of course, was made by one of the Rockefeller Family Foundations, in 1919. Since then, there have been other donations of size. President Wilson's advisor, Col. House, initially "fronted" the new C.F.R. U.N. promotion for the Internationalists, with Mr. Baruch and Mr. Frankfurter looking over his shoulder.

Hence, upon looking back over many centuries, it is apparent that those who now seek to develop a so called "One-World Government", are ever so closely linked up with the One World Bankers and the Political Speculators of old. Thus, little basic improvement has been made in our modern social structure, particularly since 1913, when Woodrow Wilson became President. In fact, the structure is even more dangerous today, due to the development of new scientific tools that greatly facilitate the speed of global financial operations, controlled by a few.

Pg. 172:

First: "Give me control over a Nation's Currency and I care not who makes its Laws." This awesome statement comes from Meyer Amschel Rothschild, the head and founder of the vast banking complex bearing his name. Today, that empire has acquired unconstitutional control of much of the money and wealth of the U.S.A. by means of its effective control of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank system. Abraham Lincoln tried hard to prevent such a situation.

Upon the base of several ancient Secret European groups Adam Weishaupt, on May Ist, 1776 (the May Day of the Communists), founded or re created an Order which he called Ile Illuminati, or The Enlightened Ones. Weishaupt was a member of a Bavarian Catholic family, educated by the Jesuits. His personal religion, however, gradually deteriorated and, in due course, it became the worship of Evil. His scheme was a World Revolutionary Conspiracy which aimed to destroy all existing Governments and Religions. In lieu of same, he planned to set up a One World Government controlled, however, by a carefully chosen Despot. This was in 1776.

"In 1841, Clinton Roosevelt published a book called The Science of Government Founded in Natural Law. That book embodies Weishaupt's pattern of a One World, 'U.N.' type Dictatorship."

In the French Revolution of 1789, history tells us that its top leaders were

members of Weishaupt's Order of The Illuminati. Recall, at the time, that some powerful Paris bankers obligingly arranged to have the normal arrival of ships bringing grain and food to supply Paris "delayed" at a designated time. This maneuver caused great distress and triggered riotous civil disorders in Paris, via the hunger route. It is obvious this catastrophe was planned-for, well in advance!

Pg. 174:

I was further astounded as the news leaked out that Alger Hiss, one of the Chief Architects of the U.N. Charter had previously agreed to a secret deal with Molotov, and other top Soviet Leaders, that the Permanent Military Head of the United Nations must always be a Red Russian. Such has been the case!

Pg. 180:

If we should become "United" our civilization, culture and heritage, as we know it, by a sudden decision of the shadowy, top "Uniters", could slip back hundreds of years! That is exactly what the U.N. Top Planners overlook. However, stripped of all their double talk they, themselves, do not intend to slip. They think that they can deftly ride through a world revolution on the wings of their money bags and power, into a new One World Government and the 99 1/2 per cent of us here at home, cannot! Hence, we are slated by them to become Peasants, mere pawns in an attempted One World Assembly Line Show! A "show" which would not last long, even if, perchance, it should have a dour, rubble smelling, opening night, playing to a well nigh empty house!

In respect to Adlai Stevenson's reported words, "coming to grips" with the "Central Theme", it certainly appears that we are not "coming to", but are now already in the grip, of a well financed "Central Theme", namely the superbly organized C.F.R. One World Group! Our best move today, as citizens, is to quickly recognize this dangerous situation and, as previously urged, withdraw from "suckership" in the United Nations. Referring to Adlai Stevenson's quoted remark, "the U.N. soldier is like no other", that observation is quite true. He is, in fact, not a soldier at all, but a thinly disguised, Secret Policeman, acting on behalf of the Bilderberger C.F.R. war mongering U.N.

Pg. 181:

The unstated objective of the U.N. Soldier however is to enable the C.F.R. sponsors of the U.N. to acquire, directly or obliquely, for their banking over lords and friends, vast new areas rich in natural resources. Thereupon, they inject a new political "democratic" government; promptly to establish a new controlled monetary system, of course, and then proceed to set in motion plans to exploit and market those natural resources. In effect, it is well organized plundering of numerous underprivileged nations on the grand scale, with you and me as misinformed Americans, paying for most of the cost of acquiring those new markets and profits for the top proprietors of the U.N.

Pg. 182:

To me, there is but one nice feature about the whole United Nations set up in New York City. That is the colorful group of flags of many nations, outside. On a brisk day these flags flutter. Little children are brought there from all over by their parents to see them. They stare and clap their little hands at the pretty sight.

This is the well planned picturesque view, outside the U.N. building. Inside, however, the representatives of the subsidized free wheeling member nations are fluttering, awaiting the proposed coming of the U.N. attempted "Peace" - that of a Godless, Dictatorship of the One Money One World Super State.

Should such a day ever arrive, all our personal Freedom, all Religions, all our Liberty, would play no part. For you and for me, nothing would be left of all that save bitter memories at the coming of Dark.

Pg. 188:

Many people say it is "impossible" to start a "Third Party", because of the cost and the difficulty in getting an organization set up to manage it. In some respects that is true. However, a "Third Party", in reality, is a Second Party because of the joint ownership, or working control, of both Democratic and Republican parties centered in New York by the One World Money, One World Power-Group.

Pg. 189:

Before the Money Forces, now cower the once two great major parties of our Constitutional Republic; the real choice today available for our people should be Conservative vs. Liberal. (A Liberal Party without One World Socialist Communist contamination, if possible.)

No doubt professional politicians, when reading those words, will smile wanly, and yawn. That does not impress me! I readily recall the Thirteen Colonies of our Constitutional Republic were not started by political "fat cats", nor was the Republic of Texas. People of character, believing in God, started both! It is high time for this nation to put on a clean political "collar", and a clean political "shirt", one not overloaded with political "B.O." and the stench of corruption arising from the Washington scene.

It we don't do this promptly, we will be left with no "shirt!"

Doubtless some duly selected appointees of the Image Makers will arise attempting to refute some remarks appearing in this book, remarks not welcome to image makers, by means of detractions aimed at me. That is understandable. Let any such efforts at detractions however, approach me from the front - not come from behind, a technique frequently used.

I have depicted the "Goliath", here, and I have fashioned "A Stone for Goliath", as it were, aiming it directly at the center of the target. Hence, behold it: the Federal Reserve Board with its shadowy new international counterparts, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Prince Bernhard's far-flung Bilderberger Group and lastly their discredited stooge, the self described United Nations.

Pg. 190-191:

The distinguished English writer, A. K. Chesterton aptly comments about Global Goals, and I quote from his revealing and brilliant book, "The New Unhappy Lords."

"The final act of Bretton Woods, which gave birth to the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, the Dumbarton Oaks Conference which created the United Nations and all its agencies, the Havana Conference which produced the General Agreement in Tariffs and Trade, and many similar assemblies of hand picked functionaries were not incubated by hard-pressed Governments engaged in waging war, but by a Supranational Money Power which could afford to look ahead to the shaping of a post war world that would serve its interest."[13] (Italics mine.)

"Alien Forces now beset us,

With their borings, in the night

By deceit and machinations,

On this Land have cast a blight,

Rally to our God, and Country,

Defend our Freedom and Its Law,

Forge a Sword for this Great Nation,

In the Halls of Old Nassau!"

Footnotes for Chapter 22

1. Wickliffe Vennard, The Federal Reserve Hoax, Forum Pub. Co., 324 Newberry Street, Boston 15, Mass., page 110. (overall ref. #48)

2. Ibid., p. 110. (overall ref. #49)

3. American Mercury, September 1959. P-20 quoting hearings before Committee on Foreign Relations, U.S. Senate, 66th Congress, Document 106, p. 536.

4. Ibid., P-22.

5. W. B. Vennard, The Federal Reserve Hoax.

6. Dr. B. Bruce, Constitutions Be Damned, Forum Pub. Co., 324 Newberry Street, Boston 15, Mass., pp. 90 and 91.

7. H. L. Hunt, Hunt For Truth, H. L. Hunt Press, 1401 Elm Street, Dallas, Texas.

8. W. B. Vennard, Federal Reserve Hoax, p. 136. (overall ref. #53)

9. "The Watch Washington Club" (Know Your United Nations). (overall refs. #54 and #55)

10. Ibid. (#55)

11. Pierre J. Huss and George Carpozi, Jr., Red Spies in the U.N., Coward—McCann, Inc., New York. 1965, p. 65.— 182

See the complete book here; Click here to read full

Kaps;

International Banker’s fixing price of Gold, Silver and Wall Street;

Dear brethren,
Lies being Taught;
Prices of Gold, silver and stock markets are market operated and no individuals has any role in these.

Now the truth;
International Banker’s fixing price of Gold, Silver and Wall Street; 
Quotes from the Book; "FDR- My Exploited Father-in-law" by Curtis Dull.

Pg. 72-73-74:

Hence, when I heard from Mama one morning, at 49 East 65th Street, that Mr. Baruch was coming to see Franklin, late that afternoon for an informal visit, I decided at once to be on hand, as it were, just in case I might be able to exchange a few words with the distinguished caller. This was early in January of 1933.

..

After a silence, he calmly said, "Mr. Dall, I think well of silver. "

For a moment, I felt floored, decidedly off-base. I managed to say, "You do, Mr. Baruch?"

"Yes", he replied, "I do! In fact, I own about 5/16ths of the world's visible supply of silver."

I struggled to come up for air, as it were, and managed to blurt out, "That certainly is a lot of silver, Mr. Baruch!"

He replied, in his strong, affirmative way, "Yes, that is a lot of silver, Mr. Dall!"

Before I could collect my scattered thoughts about "silver", Reynolds entered the room and announced, "Mr. Baruch, the Boss is waitin' to see you, upstairs, and he's mixin' up something."

Both of us then arose and shook hands cordially. Mr. Baruch entered the elevator as Reynolds held its door and departed upstairs to see FDR, where I am sure an excellent martini, made in the small, familiar shaker, was being prepared for the distinguished caller. As Mr. Baruch disappeared, I sat down abruptly to ponder the swift, unexpected turn of events. Silver! What the devil did he mean? What did I know about "silver"—almost nothing, except that it could be bought on a 10% margin.

Well, I certainly didn't do so well, I mused; I could have learned more by reading a financial column in one of the afternoon newspapers!

The measure of just how little I comprehended about that conversation was that I forgot all about it the next day.

However, a few months later, most startling news about silver did break in the press in a rather casual manner! The news about it was released over a weekend, when our financial markets were closed. In order to extend a friendly, political gesture, as it were, to our western silver mining states' Congress authorized the U.S. Treasury to double the price it would pay for silver in the open market.

Years later, when the press announced that Sir Winston Churchill had arrived in this country and was in New York visiting with Mr. Baruch before he journeyed on to the White House, bound on matters of State, I was not surprised! (As it was Mr. Bernard Baruch who ran the then US Government)

Pg. 80:

About that waste of taxpayers’ money by some subsequent White House occupants, I have often pondered. How did Harry Hopkins, who was planted to spend time there, manage to operate so successfully in a manner quite oblivious to the trusting taxpayer? Naturally, it was not an accident. There, with the help of White House "advisers", White House stationery and White House long-distance telephones, he managed to "lend" some additional $6,000,000,000 of our critical and sorely needed war materials, at the war's close, to Joe Stalin and his fellow Bolshevik! For this neat accomplishment, neither Hopkins or the U.S. ever received a word of thanks from the Soviets. Was Harry, Joe's boy?

Pg. 90:

FDR appeared quite relaxed and started to talk. He said, "Curt, we have to do something to raise the price level (of gold) before the Country can experience a recovery." He then outlined various possible ways in which he thought this could be done, including raising the price of gold. He then said to Willis and me that he was absolutely against that and "under no circumstances would I do it!"

Both Willis and I had the distinct feeling at the end of that long chat that the price level would be raised, but not in the form of raising the price of gold, thereby diluting our currency. Imagine my very great surprise when I read in a newspaper some days later that we had largely "gone off" gold. It seemed very hard for me to believe. Harder still to believe was the unconfirmed story, later on, that once a week the President, with Jesse Jones and Henry Morgenthau, Jr., would meet to determine what the price of gold would be for that week, once by shooting dice. This procedure lasted for almost a year, until the price of gold had finally advanced from $20 an ounce to over $35 an ounce. Then it was pegged there.

That wasn't a "bad" six months deal for a few international bankers to conclude on gold, was it? Twenty dollars to thirty five dollars an ounce!

Gold was taken away from Americans by inspired "legislation", except for a few limited cases, but was made available to foreigners through their banks. FDR did not initiate that particular legislation. That was ordered "from above."

Pg. 112:

For six years the stock market and other markets had been rising. Huge profits had been parlayed from modest starts by many people. Much of it was on paper. Most all the market prognosticators were still bullish and advised the market was a "buy" on important reactions. Roger Babson, a well known investment counselor, had been continually sounding a note of caution, that stocks were a "sale" on strong points. Of course, he had been wrong for a long while, but on October 24, 1929, he was more than right.

On one or two previous occasions the Panic had nearly started. Perhaps the stock market had been probed by powerful forces. Perhaps some foreign interests were getting out, first, those who sought and planned the downward readjustment of prices for profit.

Pg. 113:

As I recall it, Sir Winston Churchill appeared about 2:15 in the Visitor's Gallery as a "spectator". He was here in this country, allegedly, on what was blandly described by him as a Lecture Tour. No one on the Stock Exchange Floor, however, paid the slightest attention to him, but he got an eye full. Perhaps he had lunched with Mr. Baruch. Perhaps he had been invited to see "the show" which some feel was planned several months previously.

Pg. 115:

The main problem, as I saw it, was control over the supply of money, which controls interest rates and the call money market which, in turn, effects the broad market action of stocks, either up or down.

Pg. 116:

Others have observed that Frankfurter's trademark has been the practice of placing compliant Puppets in positions of importance within the government, willing tools who eventually formed the greatest network of agents ever to operate in this country under one man.

The yammering about the imperfections and misdoings of Wall Street soon quieted down after the ballot counting ritual of the previous November. Louis Howe, aided by important Now Deal lawyers, including my classmate, James Landis, and others, itching to flex their wings in flights over a vast new area, were busy hatching the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This Commission was to effect certain needed improvements, to be sure, but in reality is directly aimed to extend Federal Government Control over much of the country's financial machinery. For awhile, no one in the investment field could even shave or have breakfast without seeking the advice of a lawyer who "knew someone" in Washington. Even then, one had to shave in the proper direction, for comfort, or go on a recommended reducing "diet."

Pg. 54-55:

The World-Money managers had figured in mid-1929 it was time to cause a change in the Administration in 1932. They saw to it that "recovery" from the Crash was delayed until after the Inauguration of their candidate, President Franklin D. Roosevelt, in 1933 to make the most profit financially and politically. Even to many amateurs, it was manifest the "drivers" of the Democratic political vehicle did not wish to cooperate with President Hoover to save many banks from failing in late 1932 and early 1933; they wanted the financial mess to deepen in severity, both for beneficial political effect starting on March 4th, and for maximum profits to accrue to insiders, in picking up desirable "pieces" at rock-bottom prices.

See the complete book here; Click here to read full

Kaps.

Increasing interest rates does not reduce/lower Inflation.-Emerging Economies.

                   THE FREEMEN

Lies being taught;

By increasing rate of interests, inflation is reduced

OR

To reduce inflation, increase rate of interests.

Now the facts;

Increasing rates of interest is expected to reduce demand whereas in fact it reduces supply apart from increasing cost.

 

What causes Inflation; Traditional view as stated per advanced economies; 

When demand outstrips supply leading to higher prices as prices are a function of demand and supply.

Steps suggested by traditional economists to reduce Inflation;

Increase rate of interests; Increase in rates of interests will reduce demand as consumers (both individuals and firms) will be lured by high rate of interest on their savings, they will thus save more and spend less leading to moderation in demand and thus decrease in Inflation. It is also said that by increasing interest rates, makes it less attractive for people to borrow (to spend) which in turn curbs their spending habits leading to decrease in demand. Thereby leading to overall moderation of Inflation.

Kaps theory;

What causes Inflation; when supply is unable to meet Demand or costs of supply have increased leading to higher prices as prices are a function of Supply unable to met Demand plus costs of Production. 

According to me increase in rates of interests leads to decreased supply thereby leading to persistent or hyper inflation in economy as seen in India in last more than a year.

A)     Increase in rate of interests leads to overall increase in costs

i)       Cost of production;

Each and every business is dependent on debt for their production. Every increase in interest rates leads to increase in their costs of debt which they will have to pass on the consumer leading to inflation in economy. This is particularly true of emerging economies like India and china where large number of people live in slums and have meager expenses and no disposable income for savings. Rather we have to encourage people to have basic necessities of life including at least three  wholesome meals, education and health. There also must a constant up gradation of standard of living. For example; a person who has cycle must upgrade to scooter. Person on scooter must upgrade to car. Person on car must upgrade his car.

Some businesses may even be working on very low margins. Increase in cost of debt may lead to;

a)     Their declaring bankruptcies,

b)     Closure of factories,

c)     Increased unemployment,

d)     Increase in non productive assets.

ii)     Cost of supply; Increase in cost of debt will also lead to overall cost of product. Transporters run their business on debt. Similarly traders, middleman also buy on debt. Any increase in cost of debt will ultimately lead to rise in their costs which would have to be passed on the consumer.

Whereas in India Rate of Interests have been increased 12 times in last year, there is slowdown in industrial production leading to widening of gap in demand and supply.  At 4.1%, the Index of Industrial Production (IIP) is at its second-lowest level in the last 17 months. This only proves that increasing of Interest rates does not necessarily reduce gap in demand and supply but in emerging economies like India and china it may actually widen the gap in demand and supply leading to persistent or Hyper inflation as seen in India

Hence in large and emerging economies like India and China, increase in rate of interests will not necessarily lead to lower cost but is most likely lead to higher cost and lower supply, thus persistent or higher inflation.

Kaps

History of Chandigarh Freemasons Hall, and Masonic Fraternity, Chandigarh.-II

Originally published Dated 1st April, 2009

Dear Brethren,          

History of Chandigarh Freemasons Hall, and Masonic Fraternity, Chandigarh-II.

Vide letter Dt 04.09.1957, W Bro Justice Shamsher Bahadur of District Grand Lodge of England & Wales applied for 4 kanals of land for construction of “Freemasons Hall”, Chandigarh. This request was forwarded by the estate officer to Government of Punjab and was accepted by the Government Punjab, Capital Project Chandigarh and approval was communicated to Estate Officer, Capital Project, Chandigarh vide memo no 14243-59 / IX / 1052 Dt 1st February 1960. Estate Officer communicated the allotment of plot for to Justice Shamsher Bahadur vide letter No 78 Dt 9-2-1960 as under;

“..request for allotment of 4 kanal of land for the construction of Freemasons Hall can be considered provided the Association agrees to pay the price at residential rates. If this is acceptable, kindly deposit a sum of Rs 1000.00 as earnest money so that Chief Architect and Chief Town Planner may be asked to suggest a suitable site measuring 4 Kanal. “

                                                      

The allotment at residential rates were not acceptable. Representations were made to Governor & Chief Minister Punjab on the basis that plot of land was required for use of freemasons which are a ‘charitable’ and religious society. Accordingly an undertaking was sought that land will be used for freemasons Lodge. The final allotment letter No 3505 Dt 10.4.1970 issued by Estate Officer was issued in favor of “Freemasons Lodge” for the purpose of “Lodge Building”. It reads:-

“Sir,

Reference your letter No Nil, Dt 11.3.1970. A site measuring approx 2000 sq yards in sector 18-B is hereby allotted to “Secretary Freemasons Lodge For the purpose of Lodge Building i.e. Free masons Hall” at the following rate i.e. Rs 6 per sq yards for 1st acre and subsequently @ Rs 4 per sq yards.

……..

3.     The building constructed thereon shall be dedicated to LODGE PURPOSE and shall not remain sole property of the donor or to be converted by them later to any personal use.”

(As against the residential rate of Rs 36/- per sq yard. Land was allotted by Admn under Religious /cultural category at concessional rate of Rs 6/- per square yard.)

1.     Last extensive renovation of building was done by KD Aggarwal in October 2005 at his personal cost of more than Rs 70,000/- at that time.

A.     During the tenure of the then Chief Justice WB A B Saharya, a false attempt was made to for conveyance deed & the society registration. Membership was kept at Rs 5,000/-. (Rs 3000 for senior freemasons). There were more than 200 active members under GLI and another 200 under Grand Lodge of England & Wales. Sh CPS Sahni collected the fee @ Rs 5000 / 3000. According to him more than 80 persons had become members and had paid him total sum of more than Rs 3,60,000/-. No separate bank account was opened. After collecting money the matter was closed. Now there are only about 40 active freemasons under GLI many from Simla & 100 under GLEW.

B.     CPS Sahni & V K Rampal got Rs 100,000/- from GLI in name of Masonic vocational training centre. Computers were called on rent for a day and by the morning after encashment of cheque all trace of Masonic vocational training centre had vanished. Only a plate exists which says about Masonic Vocational training center. Charity begins at home, it can only be assumed that on both the occasions CPS Sahni & V K Rampal had used Masonic funds on their wives.

2.     After election of Justice Davinder Gupta as GMI, a formal get together was arranged at Chandigarh on 21.1.06. As WM of lodge 283, KD Aggarwal was told to pay for dinner which will be contributory on behalf of all Lodges. More than 100 freemasons got together from New Delhi, Yamuna Nagar, Ludhiana, Ambala, Simla etc. KD Aggarwal settled the Bill of Rs 28,000/- out of own pocket. Only Chandigarh lodge (Rs 2000), Kalka Lodge Rs 3000/-, contributed. Inspite of being WM, It was with difficulty that KD Aggarwal could get a cheque of Rs 5000 from lodge 283 from V K Rampal. There is still huge shortfall for dinner of Rs 18,000/-. V K Rampal alone used to operate Bank A/C of Lodge 283-Mountshivalik maintained at Pb State Co-op Bank sector 20, A/C No 20272 from 1991 to January 2008 and would never give any accounts. KD Aggarwal was only secretary who published lodge accounts in monthly lodge summons.

3.     Time & again money was collected in name of conveyance deed and pocketed. KD Aggarwal loaned his own funds to Freemasons at Chandigarh for conveyance Deed (Rs 150000) and registration of Society and framing of bye laws (Rs 25000). The conveyance was registered on 7.11.2007 & Certificate of Registration of Society was received on 14.11.2007. Author had arranged the meeting Dt 25.8.2007 with RGMNI, Past RGMNI, Secretary RGLNI for the formation of Fraternity. Prior to said meeting KD Aggarwal constantly received calls from S Krishnan RGMNI regarding the afore said meetings. Considering that most of the present day freemasons are poor and themselves in most need for charity, Life membership fee was kept nominally at Rs 250 per member per lodge. In all only about 40-50 were able to pay this amount. The amount was deposited in the separate bank account No 398902011022865 with Union Bank of India, Sector 21C Chandigarh. R K Banta, Satish John and S P Bedi are the authorised signatories to operate said bank account. KD Aggarwal is not authorised signatory to bank account. Whenever there was not enough money to pay electricity & water charges or property tax then, KD Aggarwal would pay from his pocket / personal account.

C.     In 2009-10 again, CPS Sahni and VK Rampal have received substantial amount from GLI name of society. We know where it will go.

D.     VK Rampal is treasurer of lodge 61 but never paid dues of GMLI or RGMLNI. When its members were asked to pay dues they stated that VK Rampal gave them option of either paying Rs 600 as lodge dues or giving their vote to him. They opted for later. KD Aggarwal as WMM regularly paid dues of GMLI and RGMLNI and they are paid Dec 2007 to June 2009.

E.     Masonic Polyclinic is paying Rs 100 per hour to Subash for working as water boy. Whereas Dr V K Rampal is paying Rs 9 per hour to his compounder in exchange of giving him freemasons Hall as rent free, water & electricity free to his staff.

F.      Dr. VK Rampal had purchased a disputed house @ half the market rate. In lower court, DRT, & at Simla High Court he enjoyed free services from ‘brotherhood’ thus deriving pecuniary benefit of Freemasonry.

G.     Brethren are aware of sale of Freemasons Hall, Kasuali which was paid by District Grand Lodge of England & Wales. One of the brethren involved therein was then AGM of India. He took away the original file including the original Conveyance Deed on the pretext of meeting with Advisor who was stated to be his class fellow. He never met the advisor and also did not return the file.

H.     On 27.4.08, KD Aggarwal convened meeting of biggest Lodge at Chandigarh for the purpose of collective renovation of building. Brethren present therein stated that Ashwani Gupta never asked them for Building renovation but gave their wives gifts, free food/dinner. Whereas in exchange of Rs 250 I have not given their wives any gift or food/Dinners.  Dr. VK Rampal said that laws of law should be amended & Chairman should give free food to wives in exchange for votes.

Members of Grand Lodge of England and wales were not allowed into Fraternity though they were as much freemasons of Chandigarh as anyone else. In 2008-09, KD Aggarwal realized that Freemasonry in general and Chandigarh Freemasonry in particular is not charitable but an organization where greed for power and money overrides humanitarian considerations. KD Aggarwal resigned from lodge 283 in May ‘08 and from Chairmanship of Freemasons Fraternity Chandigarh and all remaining lodges from November 1st 2009.

Kaps     

                                                            

Who was responsible for decolonization, Freedom of India, 100+ other countries and billions of people? Adolf Hitler, Subash Chander Bose or Mohandas K Gandhi.

Click here for Hitler was not responsible for World War 2
                    THE FREEMEN

Dear Brethren,  

Who was responsible for Decolonization / Freedom of India (and 100+ 3rd World Countries) – Adolf Hitler, Subash Chander Bose or Mohandas K Gandhi.

As India enters 65^th year of its ‘independence’ from Britain, it is time to pause and reflect as what caused 300 years old British Empire to dissolve and crumble within 20 years of the end of World War 2.

Who can be called father of India or 100+ Third World Countries or De-Colonization?

Lies being taught;

Congress Party under leadership of Mohandasss Gandhi and Jawahar Lal Nehru by their non violent Quit India movement got India its Independence.

 Now the truth;

Let us examine the role of Neville Chamberlain, Winston Churchill and Adolf Hitler or Clement Atlee, in India’s freedom in the light of events preceding Indian Independence in 1947;

Under World War 2 Treaty of Versailles, Germany was cut in several pieces and gifted to other nations. Since 1935, some of these several pieces i.e. Saar region, Rhineland, Austria, Sudetenland by the movements of their own citizens gradually rejoined their fatherland – Germany without a single shot being fired.

Danzig and German Corridor was last of such places with 98% German Population. From March 1939, Poland began programme of extermination of Germans in this city and murdered more than 45,000 Germans. On August 10, 1939;  Albert Forster, Gauleiter for Danzig, addressed a crowd of 100,000 in Danzig and invited Adolf Hitler to free them from tyranny of Polish communists. On August 25, 1939, Germany asks for plebiscite in this area to allow Freedom to people of this city to choose their own destiny. Poland/England refused to allow Plebiscite or freedom to people to choose their own destiny. On September 1, 1939, Germany enters German city Dangiz (under illegal Polish Possession) to protect German citizens from further massacre. On September 3, 1939, England and France declare war on Germany thus beginning World War 2. See here for causes of world war-2

http://lovkap.blogspot.com/2011/03/who-is-responsible-for-world-war-2-and.html

After end of 6 years, 72 million had died, Europe and Britain lay in ruins and communist Russia took over half of Europe including Poland and that small German city of Danzig (part of Germany in 1918 whose citizens were denied Freedom by England) over which England and France declared War on Germany thus beginning World War 2. Neville chamberlain refused to allow plebiscite in Danzig and declared war on Germany, Winston Churchill twice declined peace offer by Hitler once when Germany allowed besieged English forces to escape from Dunkirk and second when France fell. Churchill continued on his path of England’s destruction. http://lovkap.blogspot.com/2011/07/winston-churchill-quotes.html

World War 2 or Churchill's / Hitler’s war;

Even if Indians had wanted England to stay and built remaining railways, airports, dams, roads, bridges laying down of electric cables and water pipes etc (which incidentally have not been built even after 60 years by corrupt Congress regime - but blueprints prepared by English are still available), Britain would have left India in 1947 purely for its own military and economic insolvency back home.

Before Hitler, England and France had attacked and enslaved more than 100 countries and 100s of billions of its citizens in Africa, Asia, America including Canada, and Australia, New Zealand etc. England and France were like a big bully of your school snatching away candy of small children the 3rd world countries. America got its independence from England with the help of French Army. France helped because of contest with England and France over world domination. In 1939, Before WW-2, Britain occupied 25% of total land area on earth and 25% of world population.

Then came Hitler. Son of a customs official it took tremendous ability to rise from an obscure background of a corporal in 1919 to mastery of a nation in 1933 that had long been governed by aristocratic elites. And it took greater ability still to elevate that nation in a mere 5 years from demoralization and bankruptcy to mastery of a continent. England and France then attacked Germany. But this time they took on more than they could chew. France was overrun in a matter of 2 weeks; England lay in ruins and became insolvent. From a zero in 1933, Hitler took Germany to such heights by 1939 that it took the might of all powers America, Britain, China, Russia, France and 116 other nations etc to defeat Germany. His defeat was mainly due because his enemies (US, USSR, England, France, China and 116 other nations) had far more resources to prevail. Adolf didn't. Hitler had also banned atomic and chemical weapons. See here for details.

Within 20 years of the end of WW2 Britain was back to its small hole in Atlantic. After WWII, Britain left not only India but nearly all its other holdings, including Jordan in 1946, Palestine in 1947, Sri Lanka in 1948, Myanmar in 1948, and Egypt in 1952 and 50 other nations within years thereafter. For the same reason, France also had to grant independence to Laos in 1949 and Cambodia in 1953, and had to leave Vietnam in 1954 and other 30 nations within years thereafter. None of the other nations whether under England or French Colonialism had Mohandass K Gandhi, or Subash Chander Bose yet all countries got their independence.

Hitler thus takes the credit for an action that freed 100+ countries and billions of people from slavery and tyranny of Britain and France. Every one of these countries had their own freedom fighters, People like Subash Chander Bose, Bhagat Singh, Chander Shekhar Azad, Gandhi etc but they were only ‘also ran’ category and were not critical or even main players in Independence of 100+ nations.

Thanks to Hitler, those 100+ nations who were like small children whose candies were being snatched by big bullies like England and France for their desire of world domination got their freedom from these tyrants. Has any other person does so much for freedom of the 100s of the billions of the humans of world?

In fact if the Second World War had not taken place; England may have never left India. Maybe the 21^st century would have dawned with England still owning its colonies and sun never setting on English empire. But for Hitler several billion people in 70+ colonies of England might still be singing ‘God Save the Queen’. This is not an airy statement but one very plausible. The credit for reducing Great Britain to this dire strait thus must go to Hitler who financially and militarily destroyed England, where holding on to colonies became impossible or impracticable. The following are the details of destruction and losses suffered by England because of Hitler;

Military losses;

England suffered loss of approx 5,000,000 men (including civilians), several million more lay injured and incapacitated or disabled. It affected almost 8% of entire population on England before start of war. Its naval supremacy came to no use. Air supremacy ruled. Most of its cities and industries lay in ruins. In India, England had greatly inducted Hindus in its army for use in World War 2. Now the Hindus had nowhere else to fight. They greatly outnumbered English force. The strength of Hindus in the English army had increased from 200,000 to 2,500,000 Hindus. England manpower stood at same levels at less than 70,000 men. For England to maintain its hold over India it required at least one Englishman against three locals. They required 800,000 more men. England had no more forces to commit, rather it required its own manpower back in England to rebuild it as most of its cities and industries lay in ruins.

Economic conditions;

Within 1 year of war, England had spent all it gold and dollar reserves. England’s Treasury was empty. During the war it was dependent on lend lease from United States which US ended after War on September 2^nd, 1945. Under the lend lease, a total of $31.4 billion (at 1939 prices) aid was given by US to Britain, Now it may be worth 100 billion.  In the 1945 General Election Attlee led the Labor Party to triumph at the polls. People of England had realized that Winston Churchill was a war monger and for his personal excitement in seeing death had led them to an unnecessary war, (http://lovkap.blogspot.com/2011/07/winston-churchill-quotes.html),  killing 72 million including 500,000 of its own citizens. People of England were angry with huge extravaganza of war over a small German city of Danzig and horrendous conclusions when Danzig along with whole of Poland and half of Europe was gifted to arch enemy Russia. England became insolvent. England begged more funds from Washington. To stave off Insolvency of England, US provided a low interest loan of $3.75 billion in 1946, followed by Marshall Plan ("European Recovery Program") grants of $3 billion (which was 25% of total plan outlay under Marshall Plan). It had no money to pay for large Indian workforce of several million. Both the manpower and money were essentially needed at home to rebuild its destroyed cities and industries.

Food shortages;

England suffered food shortages. Food rationing was introduced. In 1945 rationing levels were (All figures per person per week); Bacon & Ham was limited to 113 g, sugar 227 g, tea 57 g, meat 57 g, cheese 28 g, butter 57 g, sweets 340 g even biscuits and cereals all rationed. Food rationing increased after the War. Bread, was rationed from 1946 to 1948; potato rationing began in 1947.

Reason for Independence as given during debate in England’s House of Commons;

“We have recruited our workers for the war; they have been demobilized after the war. They are required to repair the factories damaged by Hitler’s bombers. Moreover, they want to join their kith and kin after five and a half years of separation. Their kith and kin also want to join them. In these conditions if we have to rule India for a long time, we have to keep a permanent British army for a long time in a vast country of four hundred millions. We have no such army….” Sir Stafford Cripps, intervening in the debate on the motion to grant Indian Independence in the British House of Commons in 1947 quoted in ‘The Freedom Struggle and the Dravidian Movement’ by P. Ramamurti, Orient Longman, 1987.

Role of Subash Chander Bose in India’s freedom;

Many of my friends have called for role of Subash Chander Bose. Their arguments are ; Gandhi, launched the “Quit India” movement in August 1942, demanding the immediate withdrawal of the British from India or face nationwide civil disobedience. Along with all other Congress leaders, Gandhi was immediately imprisoned, and the country erupted in small violent demonstrations. The large war- time British Army presence in India led to most of the movement being crushed in a little more than six weeks;

With Congress leaders in jail after quit India movement, attention turned to Subhas Bose, who had been ousted from the Congress in 1939 Bose turned to the Axis powers for help with liberating India by force. With Japanese support, he organized the Indian National Army, composed largely of Indian soldiers of the British Indian army who had been captured at Singapore by the Japanese. Provisional Government of Azad Hind (Free India), presided by Bose, was short lived; after the reverses of 1944, the reinforced British Indian Army in 1945 first halted and then reversed the Japanese offensive, beginning the successful part of the Burma Campaign. Bose's Indian National Army surrendered with the recapture of Singapore. 

When Japan Surrendered, the British charged 20,000 men with treason. They decided to hold the Trial in Public at the red fort in Delhi. The first three of Bose's men to be charged were a Hindu, a Muslim and a Sikh. On November 21 and 23, 1945 a mass demonstration took place in Kolkota (Calcutta). Police shot more than 200 people of whom 33 died. Then the British decided to put on trial only those men INA men who were charged with committing murder or brutality against other POW's. However, Kolkata (Calcutta) simply exploded when in February 1946, Abdul Rashid Khan of INA was given seven years imprisonment for murder. Unrest began with Muslims and soon joined by students. Both the Police and Army were called to put down the 'almost revolution'. This time nearly 400 hundred people were shot down out of whom nearly 100 were killed. Khan's trial gave thousands of Indian's an excuse to revolt. revolt started with Sailor's mutiny it spread from Karachi to Bombay and from Vizag to Calcutta involving 78 ships, 20 shore establishments and 20,000 men/sailors. British forbade BBC from broadcasting the revolt.  

This sailor's revolt / mutiny spurred the new Labour government in Britain to action, leading to the Cabinet Mission to India led by the Secretary of State for India, Lord Pethick Lawrence, including Sir Stafford Cripps, who had visited four years earlier. The Labour government in Britain, its cities at home in ruins, its exchequer insolvent by World War II, and conscious that it did not have the mandate at home, decided to end British rule of India, and in early 1947 Britain announced its intention of transferring power no later than June 1948.

Points to ponder:

With all respect to people of India and particularly to those of Bengal I have a few questions?

1. INA (Indian national Army) was made up of Indian POWS captured by Japan in WW2, If there was no WW2 there would have been no INA.

2.  If Japan was not at war with England in WW2, Japan would not have supported INA?

3.     If there was no INA, there would be no trials. No trials - No mutiny - No riots.

4.     WW2 strength of natives in English army would have remained at 200,000 and ratio unaffected.
Even Subash Chander Bose knew that Key to billions of people around the World from tyranny of England and France lay with Adolf Hitler, and so he decided to meet him.  

Subash Chander Bose with Adolf Hitler

So we go back to answering the question - what led to India’s and 100 other countries to freedom within 20 years of end of World War 2 and financial and military destruction of England in World War 2? There is only one Answer - Adolf Hitler or Neville Chamberlain who declared World war-2 or Winston Churchill who twice refused cease fire / peace offer by Hitler.

Role of Mohandass K Gandhi In India’s freedom;

Gandhi and the Congress Party opted for a “Quit India Movement” against the British in 1942 and he spread the slogan “Do or Die,” which in fact Subhas Chander Bose had proposed in 1938. The British government arrested all the top Congress Party leaders. The movement fizzled out entirely within a matter of six weeks. In fact as they had hanged Bhagat Singh they could have easily done away with Gandhi or imprisoned him in a far away island like they imprisoned Napoleon at St. Helena in the South Atlantic. British had propped up Gandhi for harmless fun secure in their knowledge that its non-violent movement had no effect on them.

Chief Justice P.B. Chakrabarty of Calcutta High Court, who had also served as the acting Governor of West Bengal in India, disclosed the following in a letter addressed to the publisher of Dr. R.C. Majumdar’s book A History of Bengal:

“You have fulfilled a noble task by persuading Dr. Majumdar to write this history of Bengal and publishing it … In the preface of the book Dr. Majumdar has written that he could not accept the thesis that Indian independence was brought about solely or predominantly by the non-violent civil disobedience movement of Gandhi. When I was the acting Governor, Lord Atlee, who had given us independence by withdrawing the British rule from India, spent two days in the Governor’s palace at Calcutta during his tour of India. At that time I had a prolonged discussion with him regarding the real factors that had led the British to quit India. My direct question to him was that since Gandhi’s “Quit India” movement had tapered off quite some time ago and in 1947 no such new compelling situation had arisen that would necessitate a hasty British departure, why did they have to leave? In his reply Atlee cited several reasons, the principal among them being the erosion of loyalty to the British Crown among the Indian army and navy personnel as a result of the military activities of Netaji [Subhash Chandra Bose]. Toward the end of our discussion, I asked Atlee what was the extent of Gandhi’s influence upon the British decision, to quit India? Hearing this question, Atlee's lips became twisted in a sarcastic smile, as he slowly chewed out the word, "m-i-n-i-m-a-l!" ”

It was Clement Atlee’s training as Political Diplomat that he did not use the word “n-o-n-e”.

Worshiping false Gods. Many have made a trade of delusions and false propaganda, deceiving the stupid multitude.Blinding Ignorance does mislead us. O wretched mortals, open your eyes!

Kaps