New Age History and Economics

The Day We See The Truth And Cease To Speak it, Is The Day We Begin To Die. MLK Jr.

Sunday, July 20, 2014

Excerpts from Mein Kampf Ch IV Munich. views on Nation.

Lies being taught;
Mein Kampf is unintelligible ravings of a maniac.

Now the Truth;
CHAPTER IV Munich Views on Future of a Nation. Part B.

“but nobody thought of forming an alliance with Russia against England, just as nobody thought of making England an ally against Russia; for in either case the final result would inevitably have meant war. And to avoid war was the very reason why a commercial and industrial policy was decided upon. It was believed that the peaceful conquest of the world by commercial means provided a method which would permanently supplant the policy of force. Occasionally, however, there were doubts about the efficiency of this principle, especially when some quite incomprehensible warnings came from England now and again. That was the reason why the fleet was built. It was not for the purpose of attacking or annihilating England but merely to defend the concept of world-peace, mentioned above, and also to protect the principle of conquering the world by 'peaceful' means. Therefore this fleet was kept within modest limits, not only as regards the number and tonnage of the vessels but also in regard to their armament, the idea being to furnish new proofs of peaceful intentions.

The chatter about the peaceful conquest of the world by commercial means was probably the most completely nonsensical stuff ever raised to the dignity of a guiding principle in the policy of a State, This nonsense became even more foolish when England was pointed out as a typical example to prove how the thing could be put into practice. Our doctrinal way of regarding history and our professorial ideas in that domain have done irreparable harm and offer a striking 'proof' of how people 'learn' history without understanding anything of it. As a matter of fact, England ought to have been looked upon as a convincing argument against the theory of the pacific conquest of the world by commercial means. No nation prepared the way for its commercial conquests more brutally than England did by means of the sword, and no other nation has defended such conquests more ruthlessly. Is it not a characteristic quality of British statecraft that it knows how to use political power in order to gain economic advantages and, inversely, to turn economic conquests into political power? What an astounding error it was to believe that England would not have the courage to give its own blood for the purposes of its own economic expansion! The fact that England did not possess a national army proved nothing; for it is not the actual military structure of the moment that matters but rather the will and determination to use whatever military strength is available. England has always had the armament which she needed. She always fought with those weapons which were necessary for success. She sent mercenary troops, to fight as long as mercenaries sufficed; but she never hesitated to draw heavily and deeply from the best blood of the whole nation when victory could be obtained only by such a sacrifice. And in every case the fighting spirit, dogged determination, and use of brutal means in conducting military operations have always remained the same.
But in Germany, through the medium of the schools, the Press and the comic papers, an idea of the Englishman was gradually formed which was bound eventually to lead to the worst kind of self-deception. This absurdity slowly but persistently spread into every quarter of German life. The result was an undervaluation for which we have had to pay a heavy penalty. The delusion was so profound that the Englishman was looked upon as a shrewd business man, but personally a coward even to an incredible degree. Unfortunately our lofty teachers of professorial history did not bring home to the minds of their pupils the truth that it is not possible to build up such a mighty organization as the British Empire by mere swindle and fraud. The few who called attention to that truth were either ignored or silenced. I can vividly recall to mind the astonished looks of my comrades when they found themselves personally face to face for the first time with the Tommies in Flanders. After a few days of fighting the consciousness slowly dawned on our soldiers that those Scotsmen were not like the ones we had seen described and caricatured in the comic papers and mentioned in the communiqués...

Now, the truth is that the State in itself has nothing whatsoever to do with any definite economic concept or a definite economic development. It does not arise from a compact made between contracting parties, within a certain delimited territory, for the purpose of serving economic ends. The State is a community of living beings who have kindred physical and spiritual natures, organized for the purpose of assuring the conservation of their own kind and to help towards fulfilling those ends which Providence has assigned to that particular race or racial branch. Therein, and therein alone, lie the purpose and meaning of a State. Economic activity is one of the many auxiliary means which are necessary for the attainment of those aims. But economic activity is never the origin or purpose of a State, except where a State has been originally founded on a false and unnatural basis. And this alone explains why a State as such does not necessarily need a certain delimited territory as a condition of its establishment. This condition becomes a necessary  re-requisite only among those people who would provide and assure subsistence for their kinsfolk through their own industry, which means that they are ready to carry on the struggle for existence by means of their own work.

The qualities which are employed for the foundation and preservation of a State have accordingly little or nothing to do with the economic situation. And this is conspicuously demonstrated by the fact that the inner strength of a State only very rarely coincides with what is called its economic expansion. On the contrary, there are numerous examples to show that a period of economic prosperity indicates the approaching decline of a State. If it were correct to attribute the foundation of human communities to economic forces, then the power of the State as such would be at its highest pitch during periods of economic prosperity, and not vice versa.

It is specially difficult to understand how the belief that the State is brought into being and preserved by economic forces could gain currency in a country which has given proof of the opposite in every phase of its history. The history of Prussia shows in a manner particularly clear and distinct, that it is out of the moral virtues of the people and not from their economic circumstances that a State is formed. It is only under the protection of those virtues that economic activities can be developed and the latter will continue to flourish until a time comes when the creative political capacity declines. Therewith the economic structure will also break down, a phenomenon which is now happening in an alarming manner before our eyes. The material interest of mankind can prosper only in the shade of the heroic virtues. The moment they become the primary considerations of life they wreck the basis of their own existence.

Whenever the political power of Germany was specially strong the economic situation also improved. But whenever economic interests alone occupied the foremost place in the life of the people, and thrust transcendent ideals into the back.-ground, the State collapsed and economic ruin followed readily.

If we consider the question of what those forces actually are which are necessary to the creation and preservation of a State, we shall find that they are: The capacity and readiness to sacrifice the individual to the common welfare. That these qualities have nothing at all to do with economics can be proved by referring to the simple fact that man does not sacrifice himself for material interests. In other words, he will die for an ideal but not for a business. The marvellous gift for public psychology which the English have was never shown better than the way in which they presented their case in the World War. We were fighting for our bread; but the English declared that they were fighting for 'freedom', and not at all for their own freedom. Oh, no, but for the freedom of the small nations. German people laughed at that effrontery and were angered by it; but in doing so they showed how political thought had declined among our so-called diplomats in Germany even before the War. These diplomatists did not have the slightest notion of what that force was which brought men to face death of their own free will and determination.

As long as the German people, in the War of 1914, continued to believe that they were fighting for ideals they stood firm. As soon as they were told that they were fighting only for their daily bread they began to give up the struggle.”

Adolf Hitler

Tuesday, July 1, 2014

Who is responsible for French Revolution?- Bastile Day conspiracy !

Lies being taught;

Causes of French revolution;
1. An unmanageable national debt.
2. Food scarcity in the years immediately before the revolution
3. Peasants resented Royal absolutism and extravagancy.

Now the truth;

The Illuminati simply wanted to abolish all forms of ordered government, patriotism, religion and the family to finally set up a world government where they owned and controlled everything.

Upright people would never work for such an abhorrent program, so they marketed the words: “Liberty, Equality and fraternity”

The Illuminati used ideologies of Nihilism, Liberalism, Fascism and to market new ideologies of Marxism and Communism, whereas they themselves were perfectly independent of all ideology.

A conference was held at Mayer Amschel Rothschild's castle in Wilhelmsbad on the 16th July 1782, where the freemasons and Illuminati forged a complete alliance. In this way, the leading secret societies began a closer co-operation with the Illuminati. Thereby, Weishaupt gained no less than three million tools to work with. In time, the Illuminati were to bring death and suffering to hundreds of millions of people.

At the Masonic conference in Wilhelmsbad, a decision to murder Louis XVI of France and Gustavus III of Sweden was made. (Charles de Hericault, "La Revolution", p. 104.)

The initiative for this conference was Jewish. (A. Cowan, "The X Rays in Freemasonry", London, 1901, p. 122.) A decision to murder emperor Leopold of Austria was also made at the conference. He was poisoned on the 1st March 1792 by the Jewish Freemason Martinowitz. Gustavus III of Sweden was murdered the same month.

The Freemasons had gathered in Lyon in 1778 to discuss the coming revolution. Further congresses were held in Paris in 1785 and 1787 and in Frankfurt am Main (where Rothschild had his bank) in 1786. The Illuminati sought control over the press and began placing their infiltrators behind the scenes as "experts". The Order also wanted to influence schools.  See source

Honre-Gabriel Riquetti, Comte de Mirabeau, a leading revolutionary, indeed espoused ideals which were identical with Adam Weishaupt, founder of Bavarian Illuminized Masonry. In personal papers Mirabeau called for the overthrow of all order, all laws, and all power to "leave the people in anarchy." He said the public must be promised "power to the people" and lower taxes but never given real power "for the people as legislators are very dangerous as they only establish laws which coincide with their passions." He said the clergy should be destroyed by "ridiculing religion."

First phase: At the Assembly of Notables in 1787, Philippe was most vocal anti-royalist. Louis Philippe II, Duke of Orléans the French Grand Master of French Freemasons is accused of buying and hoarding all the grain thereby raising its price. On top of it French debt is rising due to support to American war of independence, interest has to be paid to Jewish Bankers and treasury is empty. King proposes to raise taxes.

June-July 1788:
Insurrection at Grenoble. Bernadotte, who was accused of firing the first shot or shot that killed a civilian leading to public outcry against King was a Freemason. 

8th August 1788:
Louis XVI convokes État-général to hear grievances.

5th May 1789:

Opening of the État-général at Versailles.

17th June 1789:

Representatives of the tiers état form a National Assembly swearing not to leave until a new constitution is established. In the Second Estate Louis Philippe II, Duke of Orléans the Grand Master of the Masonic Grand Orient de France headed the liberal minority under the guidance of Adrien Duport, and led forty-seven noblemen and fellow freemasons who seceded from their own estate and joined the Third Estate. (wiki)

23rd June 1789:

King rejects Resolutions of the tiers etat.

9th July 1789:

National Assembly declares itself Constituent Assembly.

12th July 1789:

Necker is dismissed. 50,000 citizens arm themselves with pikes and form National Guard.

14th July 1789:

Armed citizens storm and capture the Bastille. The Royal court accused Louis Philippe II, Duke of Orléans the Grand Master of the Masonic Grand Orient de France with able help of fellow Freemasons of being the master minds behind storming of the Bastille. On July 14, 1789, after four hours of combat, the insurgents seized the Bastille prison, killing Marquis Bernard de Launay and several of his guard. The Parisians released only seven prisoners (some say five), four forgers, two lunatics, and a sexual offender –Their names and backgrounds remain unknown till today. What led to their freedom, who wanted it and what was their role past and future in French revolution? Why was it so important to free these seven/five prisoners or any particular one of them remains a secret. prévôt des marchands (roughly, mayor) Jacques de Flesselles who may have known these facts was conveniently assassinated en route to an ostensible trial at the Palais Royal, which was under control of Louis Philippe II and thus removed from the scene effectively silencing him to speak at trial. 

15th July 1789:
Lafayette who led French army in American revolution and a freemason was appointed Commander of National Guard.

17th July 1789:

‘Great Fear’ begins as peasants revolt across France.

5-11 August 1789:

National Assembly decrees abolition of feudalism.

26th August 1789:

National Assembly decrees Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen.

September 1789:
The Louis Philippe II, the French Grand Master of French Freemasons is alleged to have bought all food and deliberately withheld grain from the people of Paris leading to shortage of food that being a direct cause of the October march on Versailles.

5th October 1789:

A Parisian crowd, composed mostly of rough women working in the markets selling fish, marched to Versailles in response to the scarcity of bread. Members of the National Guard followed the march. Lafayette led the National Guard army to Versailles. That evening, Lafayette replaced most of the royal bodyguards with National Guardsmen. At dawn, the crowd broke into the palace. Before it succeeded in entering the queen's bedroom, Marie Antoinette fled to the king's apartments. Lafayette took the royal family onto the palace balcony and attempted to restore order. At the balcony, King Louis simply appeared, and everyone started chanting "Vive le Roi!". Then when Marie Antoinette appeared people shouted to shoot her, but when she stood her ground facing almost certain death, no one opened fire. After several seconds and the lowering of muskets, people started to chant "Vive la Reine!" ("Long live the Queen"). The Duke of orlean’s The Louis Philippe II, the French Grand Master is also thought to have lied about his whereabouts when the Palace at Versailles was stormed in the early hours of the morning on the 6th of October, having stated he was at the General Assembly in Paris, yet several witnesses (including the Marquise de la Tour du Pin) saw him lead the bloodthirsty mob to a staircase leading to the Queen's bedroom, protected by Swiss Guards. La Fayette ultimately persuaded the king to accede to the demand of the crowd that the monarchy relocate to Paris.

6th October
King and the royal family moved from Versailles to Paris under the "protection" of the National Guards, thus legitimizing the National Assembly.

2nd November 1789:

Appropriation of all Church Property. Why? (Remember the Pope Clements’s decree in concert with French King Louis Philippe IV which opened on October 13, 1307 against Knight Templar’s predecessors of Freemasons.)

28th January 1790:

Removal of civil disabilities against Jews. Why? (This is another proof that French Revolution was Zionist led, Zionist sponsored and Zionist Financed.

13th February 1790:
Suppression of Christian orders and vows. This is another evidence that French Revolution was Zionist led, Zionist sponsored and Zionist Financed.

19th June 1790:
Abolition of nobility and titles. (Remember the Pope Clements’s decree in concert with French King Louis Philippe IV which opened on October 13, 1307 against Knight Templar’s predecessors of Freemasons.)

14th July 1790:

Civil Constitution, subordinating the Church to the civil government, inaugurated by Louis XVI.

30th January 1791:
Mirabeau elected President of the French Assembly.

2nd March 1791:

Abolition of Royal guilds and monopolies.

21st June 1791:
Louis XVI attempts to flee to Varennes but is recognised and forcibly returned to Paris.

15th July 1791:

Assembly declares King inviolable and restores his prerogatives.

17th July 1791:

National Guard fires on crowd protesting against restoration of the King.

13th September 1791:

King formally accepts Constitution.

30th September 1791:

Constituent Assembly dissolves.

1st October 1791:

Legislative Assembly commences.

9th November 1791:

Civil marriage and divorce instituted. Assembly orders all émigrés to return under pain of death.

11th November 1791:

King vetoes Assembly’s ruling on émigrés.

January-March 1791:

Food riots across Paris.

9th February 1791:

Property of émigrés forfeited.

7th April 1792:
Alliance of Prussia and Austria.

20th April 1792:

France declares war on Austria, but French army flees at sight of the enemy.

30th April 1792:
France invades Austrian Netherlands.


Rise of Jacobins; Political group of extreme radicalism and violence. Formed in 1789 as the Society of the Friends of the Constitution, it was known as the Jacobin Club because it met in a former convent of the Dominicans (known in Paris as Jacobins). Grand Master of French Freemasons, Louis Philippe opened the Palais-Royal head quarters of French Freemasonry to the Jacobins as a refuge from royalist censors. This palace, which was exempt from government censorship, allowed Jacobins to meet in Paris not only to discuss and debate revolution but also to print and distribute pamphlets to other Parisians. Philippe's inheritance of the Palais-Royal allowed him the ability to house a massive number of Jacobins. Only blocks away from the Tuileries Palace, where the King had been placed after being ousted from Versailles. 

10th August 1792:
The Tuileries was defended by King’s swiss guards. The Jacobins decided that it was time to storm the Tuileries, imprison and depose the king and proclaim the republic. They called on revolutionary city of Marseilles to send men ‘who know how to die’ to lead an attack on Tuileries. Six hundred volunteers set out from Marseilles, led by Francois Joseph Westermann, a Freemason. As they Mrched they sang the Chant de l’armee du Rhin composed by another Freemason Rouget de Lisle in honor of French Army at Rhine. After the men from Marseilles had sung it on their march to Paris, the song became known as La Marseillaise.

With the help of men from Marseilles, revolutionary fighters of Jacobins storm the Tuileries Palace, massacring the Swiss Guard, and the King imprisoned at Temple prison. The ‘Temple’ Prison had another connection to Freemasonry. It was built by Knight Templar’s (predecessors of Freemasons) in 12th Century as their European headquarters of Knight Templar’s. Temple prison was destroyed in 1808 as it had become pilgrimage for royalists.

19th August 1792:

Lafayette flees to Austria. Invasion of France by Coalition troops led by Duke of Brunswick.

22nd August 1792:

Royalist riots in the Vendée, Britanny; armies suffer setbacks at Langwy and Verdun.

20th September 1792:

1st session of national convention. French troop stop invading armies at Valmy. 

December 1792:
Louis XVI brought to trial, appears before the National Convention (11 & 23 December). Robespierre argues that "Louis must die, so that the country may live". Danton said: “The Kings of Europe are attacking us; let us throw down to them, as a challenge, the head of a King”. A resolution finding Louis Guilty of treason and rejecting the idea of an appeal to the people of France by Plebiscite was carried by 426 votes to 278, the decision to impose death penalty was carried by 387 to 314. A deputy then proposed that what to do with Louis XVI be postponed indefinitely. This was defeated by361 votes to 360 a single vote that of Philippe Duke of Orleans and grand Master of French Freemasons.  On 20 January, a resolution that the death sentence should be immediately carried out was passed by 380 to 310 votes.

21st January 1793:

Louis XVI Guillotined. Father Edgeworth who accompanied King Louis XVI to guillotine states thus; “I heard him pronounce distinctly these memorable words: "I die innocent of all the crimes laid to my charge; I Pardon those who have occasioned my death; and I pray to God that the blood you are going to shed may never be visited on France."”

As soon as the guillotine fell, an anonymous Freemason leaped on the scaffolding, plunged his hand into the blood, splashed drips of it onto the crown, and shouted, "Jacques de Molay, tu es vengé!" (usually translated as, "Jacques de Molay, thou art avenged"). De Molay (died 1314), the last Grand Master of the Knights Templar, had reportedly cursed Louis' ancestor Philip the Fair, after the latter had sentenced him to burn at the stake based on false confessions. Source

After the coup d'etat in France, Cagliostro stated from his prison cell in Italy that he also knew of the Illuminati conspiracy that was aimed at various thrones as well as altars throughout Europe.

Among the Zionist bankers who are said to have helped finance the French Revolution are Daniel Itzig (1722-1799), David Friedlander (1750-1834), Herz Cerfbeer (1730-1793), Benjamin Goldsmid (1755- 1808), Abraham Goldsmid (1756-1810), and Moses Mocatta (1768- 1857), partner of the Goldsmid brothers, and uncle of Sir Moses Montefiore (Olivia Marie O'Grady, "The Beasts of the Apocalypse", First Amendment Press, 2001, p. 123). All were connected to the Illuminati.

Source; Occult Theocracy  by Lady Queensborough, and L'Anti-Semitisme by the Jew Bernard Lazare, 1894.

“Webster noted, "All the revolutionaries of the Constituent Assembly were initiated into the third degree" of Illuminized Masonry, including revolutionary leaders such as the Duke of Orleans, Valance, Lafayette, Mirabeau, Garat, Marat, Robespierre, Danton, and Desmoulins.” Source.

The more the enemies of ‘revolution’ blamed Freemasons for American and French Revolution, the more revolutionary Freemasons became. If Masonic lodges were places where revolutions were planned than that was the place for ardent young revolutionaries to be. And so began a cycle of revolutions all across Europe more on it later;