Lies
being taught;
Mein
Kampf is unintelligible ravings of a maniac.
Now
the Truth; It is the opposite of what press has told
you
CHAPTER
XIII THE GERMAN POST-WAR POLICY OF ALLIANCES
Part 6
- Possibility of future alliances
Moreover,
the German people will have no moral right to complain of the manner in which
the rest of the world acts towards them, as long as they themselves have not
called to account those criminals who sold and betrayed their own country. We
cannot hope to be taken very seriously if we indulge in long-range abuse and
protests against England and Italy and then allow those scoundrels to circulate
undisturbed in our own country who were in the pay of the enemy war propaganda,
took the weapons out of our hands, broke the backbone of our resistance and
bartered away the REICH for thirty pieces of silver.
Anyone
who cannot rise to the level of this outlook must reflect that otherwise there
would remain nothing else than to renounce the idea of adopting any policy of
alliances for the future. For if we
cannot form an alliance with England because she has robbed us of our colonies,
or with Italy because she has taken possession of South Tyrol, or with Poland
or Czechoslovakia, then there remains no other possibility of an alliance in
Europe except with France which, inter alia, has robbed us of Alsace and
Lorraine.
There
can scarcely be any doubt as to whether this last alternative would be
advantageous to the interests of the German people. But if it be defended by
somebody one is always doubtful whether that person be merely a simpleton or an
astute rogue. As far as concerns the leaders in these activities, I think the
latter hypothesis is true.
A
change in public feeling among those nations which have hitherto been enemies
and whose true interests will correspond in the future with ours could be
effected, as far as human calculation goes, if the internal strength of our
State and our manifest determination to secure our own existence made it clear
that we should be valuable allies. Moreover, it is necessary that our
incompetent way of doing things and our criminal conduct in some matters should
not furnish grounds which may be utilized for purposes of propaganda by those
who would oppose our projects of establishing an alliance with one or other of
our former enemies.
The
answer to the third question is still more difficult: Is it conceivable that
they who represent the true interests of those nations which may possibly form
an alliance with us could put their views into practice against the will of the
Jewish capital, who is the mortal enemy of national and independent popular
States?
For
instance, could the motive-forces of Great Britain's traditional statesmanship
smash the disastrous influence of the Jewish finance and Marxist press, or
could they not?
This
question, as I have already said, is very difficult to answer. The answer
depends on so many factors that it is impossible to form a conclusive judgment.
Anyhow, one thing is certain: The power of the Government in a given State and
at a definite period may be so firmly established in the public estimation and
so absolutely at the service of the country's interests that the forces of
international Jewry could not possibly organize a real and effective
obstruction against measures considered to be politically necessary.
The
fight which Fascist Italy waged against Jewry's three principal weapons, the
profound reasons for which may not have been consciously understood (though I
do not believe this myself) furnishes the best proof that the poison fangs of
that Power which transcends all State boundaries are being drawn, even though
in an indirect way. The prohibition of Freemasonry and secret societies, the
suppression of the international Press and the definite abolition of Marxism,
together with the steadily increasing consolidation of the Fascist concept of
the State--all this will enable the Italian Government, in the course of some
years, to advance more and more the interests of the Italian people without
paying any attention to the hissing of the Marxist capital and press the world-hydra.
The
English situation is not so favourable. In that country which has 'the freest
democracy', the Jewish finance and press dictates their will, almost
unrestrained but indirectly, through their influence on public opinion. And yet
there is a perpetual struggle in England between those who are entrusted with
the defense of State interests and the protagonists of Marxist capital and
press world-dictatorship – the new world order.
After
the War it became clear for the first time how sharp this contrast is, when
British statesmanship took one stand on the Japanese problem and the Press took
a different stand.
Just
after the War had ceased the old mutual antipathy between America and Japan
began to reappear. Naturally the great European Powers could not remain
indifferent to this new war menace. In
England, despite the ties of kinship, there was a certain amount of jealousy
and anxiety over the growing importance of the United States in all spheres of
international economics and politics. What was formerly a colonial territory,
the daughter of a great mother, seemed about to become the new mistress of the
world. It is quite understandable that to-day England should re-examine her old
alliances and that British statesmanship should look anxiously to the danger of
a coming moment when the cry would no longer be: "Britain rules the
waves", but rather: "The Seas belong to the United States".
The
gigantic North American State, with the enormous resources of its virgin soil,
is much more invulnerable than the encircled German REICH.
Should a day come when the die which will finally decide the destinies of the
nations will have to be cast in that country, England would be doomed if she
stood alone. Therefore she eagerly reaches out her hand to a member of the
yellow race and enters an alliance which, from the racial point of view is
perhaps unpardonable; but from the political viewpoint it represents the sole
possibility of reinforcing Britain's world position in face of the strenuous
developments taking place on the American continent.
Despite
the fact that they fought side by side on the European battlefields, the British
Government did not decide to conclude an alliance with the Asiatic partner, yet
the whole Marxist Press opposed the idea of a Japanese alliance.
How
can we explain the fact that up to 1918 the Marxist Press championed the policy
of the British Government against the German REICH and then suddenly began to
take its own way and showed itself disloyal to the Government?
It was
not in the interests of Great Britain to have Germany annihilated, but primarily
of International Jewry financial interest. And to-day the destruction of Japan
would serve British political interests less than it would serve the
far-reaching intentions of those who are leading the movement that hopes to
establish a Jewish world-empire – the new world order. While England is using all
her endeavours to maintain her position in the world, the Jew is organizing his
aggressive plans for the conquest of it.
He
already sees the present European States as pliant instruments in his hands,
whether indirectly through the power of so-called Western Democracy or in the
form of a direct domination through Russian Bolshevism. But it is not only the
old world that he holds in his snare; for a like fate threatens the new world.
Jews control the financial forces of America. Year after year the Jew increases
his hold on Labour and industry in a nation of 120 million souls. But a very
small section still remains quite independent and is thus the cause of chagrin
to the Jewish capital.
The Jewish
capital and press show consummate skill in manipulating public opinion and
using it as an instrument in fighting for their own future.
The
great leaders of Jewish capital and press are confident that the day is near at
hand when the command given in the Old Testament will be carried out and the
Jews will devour the other nations of the earth.
Among
this great mass of denationalized countries which have become Bolshevik
colonies one independent State could bring about the ruin of the whole
structure at the last moment. The reason for doing this would be that Bolshevism
as a world-system cannot continue to exist unless it encompasses the whole
earth. Should one State preserve its national strength and its national
greatness the empire of the Bolshevik satrapy, like every other tyranny, would
have to succumb to the force of the national idea.
As a
result of his millennial experience in accommodating himself to surrounding
circumstances, the Jewish capital and press knows very well that he can
undermine the existence of European nations by a process of racial bastardization,
but that he could hardly do the same to a national Asiatic State like Japan.
To-day he can ape the ways of the German and the Englishman, the American and
the Frenchman, but he has no means of approach to the yellow Asiatic. Therefore
he seeks to destroy the Japanese national State by using other national States
as his instruments, so that he may rid himself of a dangerous opponent before
he takes over supreme control of the last national State and transforms that
control into a tyranny for the oppression of the defenseless.
He
does not want to see a national Japanese State in existence when he founds his
millennial empire of the future, and therefore he wants to destroy it before
establishing his own dictatorship.
And so
he is busy to-day in stirring up antipathy towards Japan among the other
nations, as he stirred it up against Germany. Thus it may happen that while
British statesmanship is still endeavouring to ground its policy in the
alliance with Japan, the Jewish Press in Great Britain may be at the same time
leading a hostile movement against that ally and preparing for a war of
destruction by pretending that it is for the triumph of democracy and at the
same time raising the war-cry: Down with Japanese militarism and imperialism.
Thus in
England to-day the Jewish financiers and press opposes the policy of the State.
And for this reason the struggle against the world-danger will one day begin
also in that country.
And
here again the National Socialist Movement has a tremendous task before it.
It
must open the eyes of our people in regard to foreign nations and it must
continually remind them of the real enemy who menaces the world to-day. In
place of preaching hatred against Aryans from whom we may be separated on
almost every other ground but with whom the bond of kindred blood and the main
features of a common civilization unite us, we must devote ourselves to
arousing general indignation against the maleficent enemy of humanity and the
real author of all our sufferings.
The
National Socialist Movement must see to it that at least in our own country the
mortal enemy is recognized and that the fight against him may be a beacon light
pointing to a new and better period for other nations as well as showing the
way of salvation for humanity in the struggle for its existence.
Finally,
may reason be our guide and will-power our strength. And may the sacred duty of
directing our conduct as I have pointed out give us perseverance and tenacity;
and may our faith be our supreme protection.
